Curb your enthusiasm: Positive expectations negatively interact with prefrontal tDCS effects on attentional control, working memory, and emotion regulation in healthy individuals

INTRODUCTION: While prefrontal tDCS is an emerging antidepressant treatment, its efficacy shows considerable variability. Common prefrontal tDCS targets overlap with placebo/expectation-related brain networks and given that tDCS is thought to modulate ongoing neural activity, expectations may critically interact with its outcomes. This proof-of-concept study investigated in healthy individuals how positive expectations modulate prefrontal tDCS effects on depression-relevant cognitive-affective processes. METHODS: Using a preregistered, double-blind, 2 × 2 between-subjects design, 200 healthy participants underwent a positive expectation induction or a control procedure, crossed with either active (2 mA, 20 min, F3/Fp2) or sham tDCS. Assessed domains included attentional control (mixed-saccade task), working memory (dual 2-back task), and a multimodal assessment of emotion regulation (self-reports, skin conductance responses, cardiac reactivity, and pupillary responses). RESULTS: Positive tDCS beliefs were successfully induced. Importantly, combining positive expectations with active tDCS consistently yielded counterproductive interactions: it resulted in non-additive redundancy for anti-saccade accuracy costs, slowed working memory, increased emotional sensitivity, and disrupted cardiovascular markers of effective emotion regulation. Positive expectations alone also reduced pro-saccadic 'go' responses, sympathetic arousal, emotion regulation efficacy, and naturalistic autonomic orienting. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these findings suggest that expectations do interact with tDCS, and positive expectations in healthy individuals may foster a suboptimal, passive state, which possibly conflicts with activity-dependent tDCS mechanisms. Although positive expectations may enhance clinical outcomes in depressed patients because of higher baseline motivation or arousal, they appear detrimental on cognitive-affective performance based tasks in healthy individuals. Critically, these findings urge the need to systematically assess the influence of tDCS expectations in both experimental and clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain stimulation
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2026.103094
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curb your enthusiasm: Positive expectations negatively interact with prefrontal tDCS effects on attentional control, working memory, and emotion regulation in healthy individuals

Jens Allaert, Rudi De Raedt, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
Brain stimulation
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Curb your enthusiasm: Positive expectations negatively interact with prefrontal tDCS effects on attentional control, working memory, and emotion regulation in healthy individuals

Jens Allaert, Rudi De Raedt, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While prefrontal tDCS is an emerging antidepressant treatment, its efficacy shows considerable variability. Common prefrontal tDCS targets overlap with placebo/expectation-related brain networks and given that tDCS is thought to modulate ongoing neural activity, expectations may critically interact with its outcomes. This proof-of-concept study investigated in healthy individuals how positive expectations modulate prefrontal tDCS effects on depression-relevant cognitive-affective processes. METHODS: Using a preregistered, double-blind, 2 × 2 between-subjects design, 200 healthy participants underwent a positive expectation induction or a control procedure, crossed with either active (2 mA, 20 min, F3/Fp2) or sham tDCS. Assessed domains included attentional control (mixed-saccade task), working memory (dual 2-back task), and a multimodal assessment of emotion regulation (self-reports, skin conductance responses, cardiac reactivity, and pupillary responses). RESULTS: Positive tDCS beliefs were successfully induced. Importantly, combining positive expectations with active tDCS consistently yielded counterproductive interactions: it resulted in non-additive redundancy for anti-saccade accuracy costs, slowed working memory, increased emotional sensitivity, and disrupted cardiovascular markers of effective emotion regulation. Positive expectations alone also reduced pro-saccadic 'go' responses, sympathetic arousal, emotion regulation efficacy, and naturalistic autonomic orienting. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these findings suggest that expectations do interact with tDCS, and positive expectations in healthy individuals may foster a suboptimal, passive state, which possibly conflicts with activity-dependent tDCS mechanisms. Although positive expectations may enhance clinical outcomes in depressed patients because of higher baseline motivation or arousal, they appear detrimental on cognitive-affective performance based tasks in healthy individuals. Critically, these findings urge the need to systematically assess the influence of tDCS expectations in both experimental and clinical settings.

Brain stimulationVol. 19(3)
Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.