123. Effect of Whole Cottonseed Delivery Frequency on Beef Cattle Performance in Warm-season Forage Systems

Abstract In the southeastern United States, whole cottonseed (WCS) is a widely available, nutritious, and cost-effective feed option for beef cattle. According to the NRC (2016), WCS consists of about 52% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 24% crude protein (CP), and 18% crude fat. Feeding guidelines for WCS in beef cattle diets were originally developed in the 1980s, based on the seed quality at that time. However, changes in cotton varieties have altered nutritional composition in the Southeast. Recent research at Auburn University evaluated the level of whole cottonseed inclusion in the diet of lactating beef cows and demonstrated that cows could effectively be fed WCS up to ad libitum consumption without adverse effects. However, producers have raised questions about how these responses may change based on frequency of feed delivery. Thus, our study aimed to determine the optimum delivery frequency of WCS to support beef cow performance during gestation. This experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with replicate pastures (n = 16; 0.8 ha) of sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum × drummondii) and signal-grass (Urochloa spp.). Cows (n = 32) in the third trimester of gestation were randomly assigned to pastures, and pastures were assigned to one of four feeding treatments: pasture-only (CON) or supplemental WCS delivered two times weekly (2X), three times weekly (3X), or daily (7X). For the treatments receiving WCS, feed was offered to achieve a 4% crude fat intake. Cows in each treatment increased total BW over time (P < 0.01) However, there was no effect of treatment on BW (P = 0.27), BW gain (P = 0.19), or blood urea nitrogen concentration (P = 0.58). These findings suggest that gestating beef cows may consume WCS at varied frequencies to match management practices without negative effects, though this may not always align with economic production goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag057.066
Primary Topic
Research in Cotton Cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

123. Effect of Whole Cottonseed Delivery Frequency on Beef Cattle Performance in Warm-season Forage Systems

Duncan McSorley, Kimberly Mullenix, C. H. Kyle, Paul William Dyce et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Research in Cotton Cultivation
article

123. Effect of Whole Cottonseed Delivery Frequency on Beef Cattle Performance in Warm-season Forage Systems

Duncan McSorley, Kimberly Mullenix, C. H. Kyle, Paul William Dyce, W Brandon Smith, S Leanne Dillard
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the southeastern United States, whole cottonseed (WCS) is a widely available, nutritious, and cost-effective feed option for beef cattle. According to the NRC (2016), WCS consists of about 52% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 24% crude protein (CP), and 18% crude fat. Feeding guidelines for WCS in beef cattle diets were originally developed in the 1980s, based on the seed quality at that time. However, changes in cotton varieties have altered nutritional composition in the Southeast. Recent research at Auburn University evaluated the level of whole cottonseed inclusion in the diet of lactating beef cows and demonstrated that cows could effectively be fed WCS up to ad libitum consumption without adverse effects. However, producers have raised questions about how these responses may change based on frequency of feed delivery. Thus, our study aimed to determine the optimum delivery frequency of WCS to support beef cow performance during gestation. This experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with replicate pastures (n = 16; 0.8 ha) of sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum × drummondii) and signal-grass (Urochloa spp.). Cows (n = 32) in the third trimester of gestation were randomly assigned to pastures, and pastures were assigned to one of four feeding treatments: pasture-only (CON) or supplemental WCS delivered two times weekly (2X), three times weekly (3X), or daily (7X). For the treatments receiving WCS, feed was offered to achieve a 4% crude fat intake. Cows in each treatment increased total BW over time (P < 0.01) However, there was no effect of treatment on BW (P = 0.27), BW gain (P = 0.19), or blood urea nitrogen concentration (P = 0.58). These findings suggest that gestating beef cows may consume WCS at varied frequencies to match management practices without negative effects, though this may not always align with economic production goals.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_2)
Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Research in Cotton Cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.