Cutting Through the Noise: Radiation Oncology Applicant and Program Director Response to Signaling During Match 2025

Purpose: Geographic and program signals allow applicants to denote preferred regions and institutions for residency training. For the 2025 Match, program signals were introduced for radiation oncology (RO). We describe the experiences of RO applicants and program directors (PDs) with these novel program signals and geographic signals. Methods and Materials: Anonymous REDCap surveys were distributed to RO applicants and PDs after Match Day 2025. Consented participants answered questions on their perspectives and behaviors surrounding signals. Results: = .26) to a program within a division of a geographic signal did not differ by applicant type. Conclusions: Program signals were universally used by surveyed RO applicants for the Match 2025, with most employing all tokens. Surveyed RO PDs reported signals influenced stages of residency recruitment, including interview invitations and ranking. Our data show that program and geographic signals may influence interview invites, but their impact on final match outcomes remains unclear. There was notably poor alignment of applicant and RO PD behaviors with the best practices regarding program signals as described by governing bodies, which should be addressed in future match cycles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2026.102037
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cutting Through the Noise: Radiation Oncology Applicant and Program Director Response to Signaling During Match 2025

Stephanie E. Weiss, Stephanie O. Dudzinski, Mary T Mahoney, Steve E. Braunstein et al.
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Cutting Through the Noise: Radiation Oncology Applicant and Program Director Response to Signaling During Match 2025

Stephanie E. Weiss, Stephanie O. Dudzinski, Mary T Mahoney, Steve E. Braunstein, Sylvia Choo, Jordan D Fredette, Jillian R Gunther, Jeremy G Price, James Murphy
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Geographic and program signals allow applicants to denote preferred regions and institutions for residency training. For the 2025 Match, program signals were introduced for radiation oncology (RO). We describe the experiences of RO applicants and program directors (PDs) with these novel program signals and geographic signals. Methods and Materials: Anonymous REDCap surveys were distributed to RO applicants and PDs after Match Day 2025. Consented participants answered questions on their perspectives and behaviors surrounding signals. Results: = .26) to a program within a division of a geographic signal did not differ by applicant type. Conclusions: Program signals were universally used by surveyed RO applicants for the Match 2025, with most employing all tokens. Surveyed RO PDs reported signals influenced stages of residency recruitment, including interview invitations and ranking. Our data show that program and geographic signals may influence interview invites, but their impact on final match outcomes remains unclear. There was notably poor alignment of applicant and RO PD behaviors with the best practices regarding program signals as described by governing bodies, which should be addressed in future match cycles.

Advances in Radiation OncologyVol. 11(6)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Temple University, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.