Interruption as a process of affective reckoning: A critical duoethnography on the continuum of violence

An initial project that began as a literature review on news media reporting of sexual violence extended into a critical collaborative duoethnography due to several unfolding interruptions throughout the research process. As early career scholars, we were motivated to pursue this duoethnography because the interruptions we experienced and their implications were embedded within the continuum of violence. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate and reflect on how violence in multiple forms has multilayered impacts, functioning as a tool of disturbance. The interruptions became integral to the journey. We revisit the stages of researching, writing, and revising the literature review. We were interrupted during this process by multiple cases and examples of violence: the story of Lisa Banfield, dehumanization and heightened violence against Palestinians, and state-sanctioned murders of Indigenous peoples in Canada. Each of these interruptions impacted our experiences as scholars and demonstrated how the challenges of reporting practices around sexual violence extend to multiple forms of violence and are entangled in insidious ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Feminist Theory
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001261429808
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interruption as a process of affective reckoning: A critical duoethnography on the continuum of violence

Karen Andrews, Safeera Jaffer
Feminist Theory
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Interruption as a process of affective reckoning: A critical duoethnography on the continuum of violence

Karen Andrews, Safeera Jaffer
article en

Abstract

An initial project that began as a literature review on news media reporting of sexual violence extended into a critical collaborative duoethnography due to several unfolding interruptions throughout the research process. As early career scholars, we were motivated to pursue this duoethnography because the interruptions we experienced and their implications were embedded within the continuum of violence. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate and reflect on how violence in multiple forms has multilayered impacts, functioning as a tool of disturbance. The interruptions became integral to the journey. We revisit the stages of researching, writing, and revising the literature review. We were interrupted during this process by multiple cases and examples of violence: the story of Lisa Banfield, dehumanization and heightened violence against Palestinians, and state-sanctioned murders of Indigenous peoples in Canada. Each of these interruptions impacted our experiences as scholars and demonstrated how the challenges of reporting practices around sexual violence extend to multiple forms of violence and are entangled in insidious ways.

Feminist Theory
McGill University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.