Perceptions of concussion management and testing among healthcare professionals in rugby union: a qualitative analysis

Despite ongoing developments in head injury protocols, rugby union still faces challenges in achieving accurate, rapid and context-appropriate concussion assessment on-field and at pitch-side, with clinicians often required to make complex decisions using tools that remain imperfect. The purpose of this research is to gain insight into the perceptions and experiences of high-level rugby union healthcare professionals (HCPs) on current head injury assessment protocols. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight HCPs working in rugby union. Following a six-stage, inductive, reflexive thematic analysis, five key themes emerged. Findings reveal that while standardised protocols offer structure to an assessment, clinical judgement remains central to effective diagnosis. Participants expressed cautious optimism towards emerging technologies, including biomarker testing and motor control assessments. This study offers practitioner-informed insights into the nuanced realities of concussion assessment. Furthermore, this work underscores the need for future tools to be evidence-based and adaptable to the real-world context of elite sport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2025-003141
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of concussion management and testing among healthcare professionals in rugby union: a qualitative analysis

Gareth Irwin, J. Palmer, Ryan S. Baker, Amber Regardsoe et al.
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Perceptions of concussion management and testing among healthcare professionals in rugby union: a qualitative analysis

Gareth Irwin, J. Palmer, Ryan S. Baker, Amber Regardsoe, Genevieve Williams
article en

Abstract

Despite ongoing developments in head injury protocols, rugby union still faces challenges in achieving accurate, rapid and context-appropriate concussion assessment on-field and at pitch-side, with clinicians often required to make complex decisions using tools that remain imperfect. The purpose of this research is to gain insight into the perceptions and experiences of high-level rugby union healthcare professionals (HCPs) on current head injury assessment protocols. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight HCPs working in rugby union. Following a six-stage, inductive, reflexive thematic analysis, five key themes emerged. Findings reveal that while standardised protocols offer structure to an assessment, clinical judgement remains central to effective diagnosis. Participants expressed cautious optimism towards emerging technologies, including biomarker testing and motor control assessments. This study offers practitioner-informed insights into the nuanced realities of concussion assessment. Furthermore, this work underscores the need for future tools to be evidence-based and adaptable to the real-world context of elite sport.

BMJ Open Sport & Exercise MedicineVol. 12(2)
University of Exeter (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.