Comparative Study of Meta-Learning and Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Supercritical Airfoils Under Small-Scale Dataset

Machine learning has demonstrated significant potential as a valuable tool for aerodynamic design. However, collecting an abundant training set is usually computationally expensive and time-consuming. To address this data scarcity, meta-learning and transfer learning offer viable strategies. Meta-learning enables models to learn efficiently from limited data by leveraging experience across related tasks, while transfer learning reduces data requirements by reusing knowledge from pre-trained models. In addition, integrating physics knowledge into the models provides a complementary path to enhance the reliability and generalizability under data-scarce conditions. This paper studies meta-learning and transfer learning strategies to realize the prediction of supercritical airfoil pressure distribution under multiple free stream conditions with a small-scale dataset. All the models are tested both in the source domain and the target domain. Then, a systematic comparative analysis of different models across different target domain training sample scales is studied. Results show that meta-learning and transfer learning both improve target-domain performance compared to the baseline model. Yet, meta-learning still achieves limited accuracy in the target domain, and data-driven transfer learning exhibits poor generalization. Compared with data-driven models, the Mach number weighted transfer learning model provides more generalized results and higher accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13040333
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Meta-Learning and Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Supercritical Airfoils Under Small-Scale Dataset

Xueming Shao, Runze Li, Lifang Zeng
Aerospace
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Comparative Study of Meta-Learning and Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Supercritical Airfoils Under Small-Scale Dataset

Xueming Shao, Runze Li, Lifang Zeng
article en

Abstract

Machine learning has demonstrated significant potential as a valuable tool for aerodynamic design. However, collecting an abundant training set is usually computationally expensive and time-consuming. To address this data scarcity, meta-learning and transfer learning offer viable strategies. Meta-learning enables models to learn efficiently from limited data by leveraging experience across related tasks, while transfer learning reduces data requirements by reusing knowledge from pre-trained models. In addition, integrating physics knowledge into the models provides a complementary path to enhance the reliability and generalizability under data-scarce conditions. This paper studies meta-learning and transfer learning strategies to realize the prediction of supercritical airfoil pressure distribution under multiple free stream conditions with a small-scale dataset. All the models are tested both in the source domain and the target domain. Then, a systematic comparative analysis of different models across different target domain training sample scales is studied. Results show that meta-learning and transfer learning both improve target-domain performance compared to the baseline model. Yet, meta-learning still achieves limited accuracy in the target domain, and data-driven transfer learning exhibits poor generalization. Compared with data-driven models, the Mach number weighted transfer learning model provides more generalized results and higher accuracy.

AerospaceVol. 13(4)
Zhejiang Lab (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.