Testing the Strength of Buried Surface Hoar Weak Layers Under Combined Compression and Shear Loading

Abstract We experimentally determined the multiaxial strength of weak layers of buried surface hoar using displacement‐controlled tests under combined normal and shear loading on a custom testing machine. We tested 63 samples from three different weak layers, with strengths ranging from 1 to 10 kPa with considerable scattering. While shear strength was lower than compressive strength (typically about one to two thirds), we did not observe the very low shear strengths implied by a Mohr‐Coulomb‐cap type of failure envelope. Instead, our data were better described by elliptical failure envelopes, consistent with numerical predictions for other weak layer types. Density and microstructural parameters were quantified from micro‐computed tomography. Bulk density alone did not predict strength or envelope shape, but the data are not yet sufficient to derive robust quantitative structure–property relations. The envelope shape also appeared to be unrelated to the elastic properties, indicating that different microstructural aspects might govern elasticity and strength.

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120870
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the Strength of Buried Surface Hoar Weak Layers Under Combined Compression and Shear Loading

Geophysical Research Letters
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Testing the Strength of Buried Surface Hoar Weak Layers Under Combined Compression and Shear Loading

article en

Abstract

Abstract We experimentally determined the multiaxial strength of weak layers of buried surface hoar using displacement‐controlled tests under combined normal and shear loading on a custom testing machine. We tested 63 samples from three different weak layers, with strengths ranging from 1 to 10 kPa with considerable scattering. While shear strength was lower than compressive strength (typically about one to two thirds), we did not observe the very low shear strengths implied by a Mohr‐Coulomb‐cap type of failure envelope. Instead, our data were better described by elliptical failure envelopes, consistent with numerical predictions for other weak layer types. Density and microstructural parameters were quantified from micro‐computed tomography. Bulk density alone did not predict strength or envelope shape, but the data are not yet sufficient to derive robust quantitative structure–property relations. The envelope shape also appeared to be unrelated to the elastic properties, indicating that different microstructural aspects might govern elasticity and strength.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(7)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.