Prognostic Value of Remote Monitoring Alarms for Technique Failure in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

INTRODUCTION: While remote patient monitoring (RPM) is associated with decreased hospitalization and technique failure in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), the prognostic utility of individual alarm patterns remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of adult APD patients managed with the Sharesource RPM platform at National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Three predefined red-flag alarms, including initial drain variance > 50%, lost therapy volume > 10%, and lost treatment time > 30 min, were recorded from September 2019 to May 2020. Alarm burden was expressed as episodes per patient-month and categorized into tertiles. Patients were followed for three years for death-censored technique failure, defined as permanent transfer to hemodialysis. Associations were evaluated using logistic regression. Fine and Gray competing-risk models and generalized estimating equations (GEE) served as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (mean age 45 ± 13 years; 61.2% male) generated 272 alarm episodes. The initial drain variance accounted for 54.8% of alarms, lost treatment time for 39.3%, and lost therapy volume for 5.9%. Technique-failure occurred in eight patients (11.9%), with rates rising across alarm-frequency tertiles (4.5%, 9.1%, and 21.7%; P for trend = 0.074). In multivariable analysis, initial drain variance > 50% independently predicted technique failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.04; P = 0.006). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses (Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.25; GEE OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.00-6.62). The other two alarm types were not significantly associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION: An RPM alarm for initial drain variance > 50% emerged as an early marker of technique failure in APD. Incorporating alarm-pattern analysis into routine RPM review may facilitate targeted surveillance and timely intervention for high-risk patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Purification
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000551828
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Value of Remote Monitoring Alarms for Technique Failure in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

Kuan‐Hung Liu, Junne‐Ming Sung, Kuan-Chiao Huang, Wei-Ren Lin et al.
Blood Purification
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Prognostic Value of Remote Monitoring Alarms for Technique Failure in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

Kuan‐Hung Liu, Junne‐Ming Sung, Kuan-Chiao Huang, Wei-Ren Lin, Chia-Chun Lee, Ming-Cheng Wang, Jo-Yen Chao, Chin-Chung Tseng
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While remote patient monitoring (RPM) is associated with decreased hospitalization and technique failure in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), the prognostic utility of individual alarm patterns remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of adult APD patients managed with the Sharesource RPM platform at National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Three predefined red-flag alarms, including initial drain variance > 50%, lost therapy volume > 10%, and lost treatment time > 30 min, were recorded from September 2019 to May 2020. Alarm burden was expressed as episodes per patient-month and categorized into tertiles. Patients were followed for three years for death-censored technique failure, defined as permanent transfer to hemodialysis. Associations were evaluated using logistic regression. Fine and Gray competing-risk models and generalized estimating equations (GEE) served as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (mean age 45 ± 13 years; 61.2% male) generated 272 alarm episodes. The initial drain variance accounted for 54.8% of alarms, lost treatment time for 39.3%, and lost therapy volume for 5.9%. Technique-failure occurred in eight patients (11.9%), with rates rising across alarm-frequency tertiles (4.5%, 9.1%, and 21.7%; P for trend = 0.074). In multivariable analysis, initial drain variance > 50% independently predicted technique failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.04; P = 0.006). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses (Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.25; GEE OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.00-6.62). The other two alarm types were not significantly associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION: An RPM alarm for initial drain variance > 50% emerged as an early marker of technique failure in APD. Incorporating alarm-pattern analysis into routine RPM review may facilitate targeted surveillance and timely intervention for high-risk patients.

Blood Purification
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.