Shifting priorities in teachers’ professional knowledge: a relational turn in teaching (2008–2022)

Purpose This paper compares teachers' evaluations of three components of professional knowledge: subject knowledge (SK), knowledge about learning (KL), and relational knowledge (RK) in 2008 and 2022. It also examines differences between experience-groups and over time, amid rapid reforms, expanded role and professionalisation of teaching. Design/methodology/approach Repeated cross-sectional survey data (2008: n = 2205; 2022: n = 563) were used to compare teachers' evaluations over time and between teacher groups. Descriptive statistics and t-tests assessed change, Cohen's D assessed effect size and OLS regression models examined differences in evaluation of importance between teacher experience groups. Findings SK, KL, and RK are important components of teachers' professional knowledge. Significant shifts reflect changing educational priorities, with RK becoming the highest-valued knowledge type in 2022, signalling a “relational turn” in teaching. In 2008, all experience groups differed. In 2022, novices and intermediate experienced teachers no longer differed, while very experienced teachers differed from novices. Patterns highlight the evolving role of professional capital and changes in teacher preparation. School level predicted part of this gap, underscoring context-sensitive concerns. Originality/value This study offers a unique longitudinal perspective on how teachers' evaluations of professional knowledge change amid policy changes and societal demands, interpreted through Professional Capital Theory. The results have implications for practice, policy and future research. Teacher education, induction programmes and collaborations should consider context-sensitive concerns and develop relational competences while preserving subject-matter and pedagogical foundations. Future research should address time-contextual aspect when examining evaluations of knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-08-2025-0099
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting priorities in teachers’ professional knowledge: a relational turn in teaching (2008–2022)

Hanna Holmeide
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Shifting priorities in teachers’ professional knowledge: a relational turn in teaching (2008–2022)

Hanna Holmeide
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper compares teachers' evaluations of three components of professional knowledge: subject knowledge (SK), knowledge about learning (KL), and relational knowledge (RK) in 2008 and 2022. It also examines differences between experience-groups and over time, amid rapid reforms, expanded role and professionalisation of teaching. Design/methodology/approach Repeated cross-sectional survey data (2008: n = 2205; 2022: n = 563) were used to compare teachers' evaluations over time and between teacher groups. Descriptive statistics and t-tests assessed change, Cohen's D assessed effect size and OLS regression models examined differences in evaluation of importance between teacher experience groups. Findings SK, KL, and RK are important components of teachers' professional knowledge. Significant shifts reflect changing educational priorities, with RK becoming the highest-valued knowledge type in 2022, signalling a “relational turn” in teaching. In 2008, all experience groups differed. In 2022, novices and intermediate experienced teachers no longer differed, while very experienced teachers differed from novices. Patterns highlight the evolving role of professional capital and changes in teacher preparation. School level predicted part of this gap, underscoring context-sensitive concerns. Originality/value This study offers a unique longitudinal perspective on how teachers' evaluations of professional knowledge change amid policy changes and societal demands, interpreted through Professional Capital Theory. The results have implications for practice, policy and future research. Teacher education, induction programmes and collaborations should consider context-sensitive concerns and develop relational competences while preserving subject-matter and pedagogical foundations. Future research should address time-contextual aspect when examining evaluations of knowledge.

Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Centre for Advanced Study (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shifting priorities in teachers’ professional knowledge: a relational turn in teaching (2008–2022) — Hanna Holmeide · Journal of Professional Capital and Community (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS