Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement

Political participation is a key mechanism through which individuals express their preferences in democratic systems. Thus, unequal participation may allow some groups to exert disproportionate influence on political outcomes. This research examines the existence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in political engagement and sheds light on the psychological mechanisms driving these disparities across seven studies. Using nationwide surveys from 47 countries ( N = 70,417), Study 1 reveals an SES gap in political engagement across various domains (e.g., voting, boycotting) and shows that this gap is partly due to lower political efficacy—one's perceived ability to influence political affairs—among low-SES individuals. Study 2 ( N = 545) replicates these findings in a representative sample of the Brazilian population, using a behavioral proxy for political participation. Studies 3a-c ( N 3a = 301; N 3b = 302; N 3c = 301) experimentally manipulate SES among U.S. participants and show that effectively inducing lower-SES perceptions reduces political engagement. Studies 4a-b ( N 4a = 301; N 4b = 328) test an intervention in a lab-in-the-field experiment with extremely deprived residents of Rio de Janeiro's slums, showing that enhancing political efficacy increases participation among low-SES individuals both in the run-up to and in the aftermath of a national election. Together, these studies demonstrate that while SES is consistently linked to political participation, addressing psychological barriers and fostering political efficacy can help close the participation gap. In addition, this work contributes to broader methodological debates surrounding the measurement and experimental manipulation of socioeconomic conditions in psychological research. • Low-SES individuals are less politically engaged than high-SES individuals. • Political efficacy explains the association between SES and political engagement. • Promoting political efficacy can boost participation among low-SES individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104922
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement

Yan Vieites, Rodrigo Furst, Bernardo Andretti
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Unequal participation: How low socioeconomic status hinders political engagement

Yan Vieites, Rodrigo Furst, Bernardo Andretti
article en

Abstract

Political participation is a key mechanism through which individuals express their preferences in democratic systems. Thus, unequal participation may allow some groups to exert disproportionate influence on political outcomes. This research examines the existence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in political engagement and sheds light on the psychological mechanisms driving these disparities across seven studies. Using nationwide surveys from 47 countries ( N = 70,417), Study 1 reveals an SES gap in political engagement across various domains (e.g., voting, boycotting) and shows that this gap is partly due to lower political efficacy—one's perceived ability to influence political affairs—among low-SES individuals. Study 2 ( N = 545) replicates these findings in a representative sample of the Brazilian population, using a behavioral proxy for political participation. Studies 3a-c ( N 3a = 301; N 3b = 302; N 3c = 301) experimentally manipulate SES among U.S. participants and show that effectively inducing lower-SES perceptions reduces political engagement. Studies 4a-b ( N 4a = 301; N 4b = 328) test an intervention in a lab-in-the-field experiment with extremely deprived residents of Rio de Janeiro's slums, showing that enhancing political efficacy increases participation among low-SES individuals both in the run-up to and in the aftermath of a national election. Together, these studies demonstrate that while SES is consistently linked to political participation, addressing psychological barriers and fostering political efficacy can help close the participation gap. In addition, this work contributes to broader methodological debates surrounding the measurement and experimental manipulation of socioeconomic conditions in psychological research. • Low-SES individuals are less politically engaged than high-SES individuals. • Political efficacy explains the association between SES and political engagement. • Promoting political efficacy can boost participation among low-SES individuals.

Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol. 125
NEOMA Business School (FR), University of Oxford (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.