Hybrid DEM-FDM Modelling of Ballasted Railway Track Performance

The performance of ballasted railway tracks under cyclic loading is a critical issue in urban railway systems, where high traffic frequency and geometric constraints accelerate track degradation, leading to the accumulation of plastic deformations that may reduce operational efficiency. This study presents a numerical framework for rail track performance assessment based on two complementary modeling approaches: a fully continuous Finite Difference Method (FDM) model, and a hybrid Discrete Element Method–Finite Difference Method (DEM–FDM) model. The continuous FDM simulations are employed to evaluate the global mechanical response of the track support system and to compute conventional stability indicators, including the factor of safety (FS). In parallel, the hybrid DEM–FDM simulations explicitly represent the ballast layer using DEM to capture inter-particle interactions, accumulation of permanent deformation, and particle fragmentation under cyclic loading, while rails, sleepers, sub-ballast, and subgrade are modeled using FDM to describe system-level load transfer. Ballast performance is assessed by linking safety factors obtained from the continuous models with mechanically derived permanent deformation and stress measures extracted from the hybrid simulations. The proposed dual-modeling framework enables a systematic investigation of the influence of ballast layer thickness and material type on deformation accumulation, stress transmission, and granular degradation mechanisms. The results reveal distinct behavioral trends among different ballast materials, showing that increased ballast thickness generally improves track performance, while material-specific degradation mechanisms govern the evolution of permanent deformation under repeated loading. The proposed approach establishes a quantitative bridge between traditional stability-based design metrics and deformation-based performance indicators, providing a rational basis for performance-based evaluation, comparison, and optimization of ballast configurations through a set of robust numerically derived relationships for railway track design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11040126
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid DEM-FDM Modelling of Ballasted Railway Track Performance

Nohemí Olivera, Juan Manuel Mayoral
Infrastructures
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
article

Hybrid DEM-FDM Modelling of Ballasted Railway Track Performance

Nohemí Olivera, Juan Manuel Mayoral
article en

Abstract

The performance of ballasted railway tracks under cyclic loading is a critical issue in urban railway systems, where high traffic frequency and geometric constraints accelerate track degradation, leading to the accumulation of plastic deformations that may reduce operational efficiency. This study presents a numerical framework for rail track performance assessment based on two complementary modeling approaches: a fully continuous Finite Difference Method (FDM) model, and a hybrid Discrete Element Method–Finite Difference Method (DEM–FDM) model. The continuous FDM simulations are employed to evaluate the global mechanical response of the track support system and to compute conventional stability indicators, including the factor of safety (FS). In parallel, the hybrid DEM–FDM simulations explicitly represent the ballast layer using DEM to capture inter-particle interactions, accumulation of permanent deformation, and particle fragmentation under cyclic loading, while rails, sleepers, sub-ballast, and subgrade are modeled using FDM to describe system-level load transfer. Ballast performance is assessed by linking safety factors obtained from the continuous models with mechanically derived permanent deformation and stress measures extracted from the hybrid simulations. The proposed dual-modeling framework enables a systematic investigation of the influence of ballast layer thickness and material type on deformation accumulation, stress transmission, and granular degradation mechanisms. The results reveal distinct behavioral trends among different ballast materials, showing that increased ballast thickness generally improves track performance, while material-specific degradation mechanisms govern the evolution of permanent deformation under repeated loading. The proposed approach establishes a quantitative bridge between traditional stability-based design metrics and deformation-based performance indicators, providing a rational basis for performance-based evaluation, comparison, and optimization of ballast configurations through a set of robust numerically derived relationships for railway track design.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(4)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.