International Sports Federations vs. Criminal Liability.

The article examines issues of criminal liability in the activities of international sports federations as quasi-public entities within the system of global sports governance. It analyzes the contradiction between the private-law status of sports federations and the actual scope of the authoritative powers they exercise at the international level. The study identifies the main criminal-law risks inherent in their functioning, including corruption, financial crimes, manipulation of sports results, abuse of regulatory powers, and pressure exerted on employees and national federations, particularly those that are financially dependent. Special attention is paid to the absence of a unified international mechanism of criminal liability for legal entities and to the conflict between the principle of autonomy of sport and the priority of public criminal jurisdiction. The article formulates proposals for improving international and national regulation, extending the scope of liability, and introducing effective compliance mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Law Studies
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2026-14-1-16-20
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Sports Federations vs. Criminal Liability.

LEYLA KULIYEVA
Advances in Law Studies
Doping in Sports
article

International Sports Federations vs. Criminal Liability.

LEYLA KULIYEVA
article en

Abstract

The article examines issues of criminal liability in the activities of international sports federations as quasi-public entities within the system of global sports governance. It analyzes the contradiction between the private-law status of sports federations and the actual scope of the authoritative powers they exercise at the international level. The study identifies the main criminal-law risks inherent in their functioning, including corruption, financial crimes, manipulation of sports results, abuse of regulatory powers, and pressure exerted on employees and national federations, particularly those that are financially dependent. Special attention is paid to the absence of a unified international mechanism of criminal liability for legal entities and to the conflict between the principle of autonomy of sport and the priority of public criminal jurisdiction. The article formulates proposals for improving international and national regulation, extending the scope of liability, and introducing effective compliance mechanisms.

Advances in Law StudiesVol. 14(1)
Moscow University «Synergy» (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

International Sports Federations vs. Criminal Liability. — LEYLA KULIYEVA · Advances in Law Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS