Uncertainty-Aware Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength and Fracture Anisotropy in Deep Shales: A Leakage-Free Physics-Constrained Machine Learning Framework

The continuous prediction and uncertainty quantification of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and the fracture-related index of anisotropy (FRIA) are essential for optimizing drilling operations and hydraulic fracturing design in shale gas development. However, machine-learning-based log inversion often suffers from (1) spatial information leakage caused by autocorrelation in well logs, (2) implicit target contamination during multi-source data fusion, and (3) biased evaluation under random data splitting, which can overestimate apparent performance and underestimate extrapolation risk in deep heterogeneous intervals. To address these limitations, we propose a leakage-free, physics-constrained framework for predicting UCS and FRIA in the Weiyuan shale gas reservoir. Using 18,440 quality-controlled, depth-aligned samples, we adopt a contiguous depth-based split that preserves stratigraphic continuity while isolating training, validation, and test intervals to block spatial leakage. Under a strict leakage-free protocol, we evaluate single-task ensemble trees (STL-RF/HGB), a multi-task neural network (MTL-MLP), and a physics-informed variant (PINN-MLP) for deep-interval stabilization. The best model is target-dependent: STL-RF achieves R2 = 0.984 for FRIA, whereas MTL-MLP attains R2 = 0.874 for UCS. For deep formations (>4800 m), PINN-MLP with a depth-continuity constraint reduces deep-interval prediction error by 47.5%. Multi-seed experiments with 95% Student’s t confidence intervals further confirm robustness. Overall, the framework provides a reproducible workflow for continuous geomechanical-parameter prediction and risk-aware deployment in deep unconventional reservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073471
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty-Aware Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength and Fracture Anisotropy in Deep Shales: A Leakage-Free Physics-Constrained Machine Learning Framework

Yicheng Song, Xinpu Shen
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
10.06
article

Uncertainty-Aware Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength and Fracture Anisotropy in Deep Shales: A Leakage-Free Physics-Constrained Machine Learning Framework

Yicheng Song, Xinpu Shen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The continuous prediction and uncertainty quantification of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and the fracture-related index of anisotropy (FRIA) are essential for optimizing drilling operations and hydraulic fracturing design in shale gas development. However, machine-learning-based log inversion often suffers from (1) spatial information leakage caused by autocorrelation in well logs, (2) implicit target contamination during multi-source data fusion, and (3) biased evaluation under random data splitting, which can overestimate apparent performance and underestimate extrapolation risk in deep heterogeneous intervals. To address these limitations, we propose a leakage-free, physics-constrained framework for predicting UCS and FRIA in the Weiyuan shale gas reservoir. Using 18,440 quality-controlled, depth-aligned samples, we adopt a contiguous depth-based split that preserves stratigraphic continuity while isolating training, validation, and test intervals to block spatial leakage. Under a strict leakage-free protocol, we evaluate single-task ensemble trees (STL-RF/HGB), a multi-task neural network (MTL-MLP), and a physics-informed variant (PINN-MLP) for deep-interval stabilization. The best model is target-dependent: STL-RF achieves R2 = 0.984 for FRIA, whereas MTL-MLP attains R2 = 0.874 for UCS. For deep formations (>4800 m), PINN-MLP with a depth-continuity constraint reduces deep-interval prediction error by 47.5%. Multi-seed experiments with 95% Student’s t confidence intervals further confirm robustness. Overall, the framework provides a reproducible workflow for continuous geomechanical-parameter prediction and risk-aware deployment in deep unconventional reservoirs.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(7)
Liaoning Shihua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
10.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.