Research on the influence of fabrication methods on the performance of fusion reactor divertors

• The ability of the divertor to remove 20 MW/m 2 for 1000 cycles has been verified. • The influences of different fabrication methods on the performance of the divertors are investigated. • HHF tests results indicate divertor fabricate by “‘casting + HIP’+EW + VB” performs better than “‘casting + HIP’+EW + HIP”. • The fabrication method “‘casting + HIP’+EW + VB” is very promising for use in the divertors for other fusion devices or reactors. The divertor is a critical plasma-facing component in fusion reactors, presenting significant challenges in design and manufacturing. Utilizing a sandwich-like layered structure, the flat-type divertor requires distinct fabrication methods for interlayer bonding due to the varying welding properties of its constituent materials. The bonding quality at each interface is paramount, directly determining the component’s operational performance and lifespan. Thus, achieving reliable bonding under operating conditions is a stringent requirement. While current studies highlight the impact of fabrication methods on performance, direct comparative evaluation remains difficult due to inconsistencies in materials, structures, and test parameters across existing literature. To address this, this work reports the evaluation results on two divertor mock-ups. These mock-ups are differentiated solely by the bonding method applied at the interface between the intermediate interlayer (copper, Cu) and the heat sink material (oxide dispersion strengthened copper, ODS-Cu). Specifically, the first mock-up was fabricated using Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIPping), whereas the second mock-up was bonded via brazing. Then, the effects of these two methods on heat transfer, thermal fatigue resistance and overall reliability were systematically investigated through high heat flux test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2026.102113
Primary Topic
Fusion materials and technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the influence of fabrication methods on the performance of fusion reactor divertors

Mingchi Feng, Shuai Huang, Nanyu Mou, Damao Yao et al.
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Fusion materials and technologies
article

Research on the influence of fabrication methods on the performance of fusion reactor divertors

Mingchi Feng, Shuai Huang, Nanyu Mou, Damao Yao, Jia Zheng, Le Han
article en

Abstract

• The ability of the divertor to remove 20 MW/m 2 for 1000 cycles has been verified. • The influences of different fabrication methods on the performance of the divertors are investigated. • HHF tests results indicate divertor fabricate by “‘casting + HIP’+EW + VB” performs better than “‘casting + HIP’+EW + HIP”. • The fabrication method “‘casting + HIP’+EW + VB” is very promising for use in the divertors for other fusion devices or reactors. The divertor is a critical plasma-facing component in fusion reactors, presenting significant challenges in design and manufacturing. Utilizing a sandwich-like layered structure, the flat-type divertor requires distinct fabrication methods for interlayer bonding due to the varying welding properties of its constituent materials. The bonding quality at each interface is paramount, directly determining the component’s operational performance and lifespan. Thus, achieving reliable bonding under operating conditions is a stringent requirement. While current studies highlight the impact of fabrication methods on performance, direct comparative evaluation remains difficult due to inconsistencies in materials, structures, and test parameters across existing literature. To address this, this work reports the evaluation results on two divertor mock-ups. These mock-ups are differentiated solely by the bonding method applied at the interface between the intermediate interlayer (copper, Cu) and the heat sink material (oxide dispersion strengthened copper, ODS-Cu). Specifically, the first mock-up was fabricated using Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIPping), whereas the second mock-up was bonded via brazing. Then, the effects of these two methods on heat transfer, thermal fatigue resistance and overall reliability were systematically investigated through high heat flux test.

Nuclear Materials and EnergyVol. 47
Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hefei Institutes of Physical Science (CN), Institute of Plasma Physics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Fusion materials and technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.