<i>b</i> EST—Universal Estimation of the Gutenberg–Richter <i>b</i> Value, with a MATLAB/Python Toolbox

Abstract The b value, the scaling exponent of the Gutenberg–Richter law, is a widely investigated parameter in statistical seismology, quantifying the relative proportion of small and large earthquakes in a seismic catalog. Despite its simple definition, an accurate and reliable estimation is not straightforward due to some methodological limitations (e.g., assumptions behind their derivation) and to catalog incompleteness. Different methods have been proposed during the last six decades for measuring the b value. Among them, the b-positive approach, using the positive difference of consecutive magnitudes, enables the mitigation of the so-called short-term incompleteness. In this article, we review these methods, showing that all the approaches converge to a universal formula if the magnitudes of earthquakes are properly standardized and selected. We also review b value estimations by establishing methodological consistency through comparison with extensive simulations. Moreover, we provide bEST, a novel MATLAB/Python tool for a multimethodological assessment of the b value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismological Research Letters
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250175
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

b EST—Universal Estimation of the Gutenberg–Richter b Value, with a MATLAB/Python Toolbox

Giovanni Vitale, Davide Zaccagnino, Anna Figlioli, Giuseppe Falcone et al.
Seismological Research Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

b EST—Universal Estimation of the Gutenberg–Richter b Value, with a MATLAB/Python Toolbox

Giovanni Vitale, Davide Zaccagnino, Anna Figlioli, Giuseppe Falcone, Ilaria Spassiani, Matteo Taroni, Giuseppe Petrillo
article en

Abstract

Abstract The b value, the scaling exponent of the Gutenberg–Richter law, is a widely investigated parameter in statistical seismology, quantifying the relative proportion of small and large earthquakes in a seismic catalog. Despite its simple definition, an accurate and reliable estimation is not straightforward due to some methodological limitations (e.g., assumptions behind their derivation) and to catalog incompleteness. Different methods have been proposed during the last six decades for measuring the b value. Among them, the b-positive approach, using the positive difference of consecutive magnitudes, enables the mitigation of the so-called short-term incompleteness. In this article, we review these methods, showing that all the approaches converge to a universal formula if the magnitudes of earthquakes are properly standardized and selected. We also review b value estimations by establishing methodological consistency through comparison with extensive simulations. Moreover, we provide bEST, a novel MATLAB/Python tool for a multimethodological assessment of the b value.

Seismological Research Letters
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Earth Observatory of Singapore (SG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.