Agrobiological Evaluation of Microbiologically Processed Cattle Manure on Soil Properties and Spring Wheat Productivity in Northern Kazakhstan

Under rainfed conditions of Northern Kazakhstan, the effects of microbiologically processed cattle manure (CCM) on soil agrochemical and microbiological properties, yield structure, and spring wheat productivity were evaluated over two contrasting growing seasons (2024–2025). Field experiments on chernozem soils tested manure rates of 5–30 t ha−1. Favorable hydrothermal conditions in 2024 enhanced fertilizer efficiency compared with the drier 2025 season. CCM application increased soil nitrate nitrogen from low (<8 mg kg−1) to medium levels (8–12 mg kg−1), while available phosphorus and potassium increased by 15–35% relative to the control across key growth stages. The abundance of major functional microbial groups increased by 1.5–3.0-fold, particularly nitrogen-transforming and cellulose-degrading microorganisms. Grain yield improved significantly in both years, with the highest and most stable yields observed at 15–20 t ha−1, resulting in yield gains of 18–32% compared with the control. Yield improvements were associated with increases in grain number per spike (up to 25–27 grains) and grain weight per spike (up to 1.42–1.62 g). Higher manure rates (20–30 t ha−1) did not confer additional yield benefits. Overall, these findings indicate that moderate CCM application effectively enhances soil fertility, stimulates microbial activity, and improves wheat productivity under dryland conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070742
Primary Topic
Soil and Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agrobiological Evaluation of Microbiologically Processed Cattle Manure on Soil Properties and Spring Wheat Productivity in Northern Kazakhstan

S. N. Elansky, Bayan Nuralykyzy, Ainash Nauanova, Guljanat Serikbay et al.
Agronomy
Soil and Environmental Studies
article

Agrobiological Evaluation of Microbiologically Processed Cattle Manure on Soil Properties and Spring Wheat Productivity in Northern Kazakhstan

S. N. Elansky, Bayan Nuralykyzy, Ainash Nauanova, Guljanat Serikbay, Adina Daribek, Assem Sergebayeva, Assiya Algozhina
article en

Abstract

Under rainfed conditions of Northern Kazakhstan, the effects of microbiologically processed cattle manure (CCM) on soil agrochemical and microbiological properties, yield structure, and spring wheat productivity were evaluated over two contrasting growing seasons (2024–2025). Field experiments on chernozem soils tested manure rates of 5–30 t ha−1. Favorable hydrothermal conditions in 2024 enhanced fertilizer efficiency compared with the drier 2025 season. CCM application increased soil nitrate nitrogen from low (<8 mg kg−1) to medium levels (8–12 mg kg−1), while available phosphorus and potassium increased by 15–35% relative to the control across key growth stages. The abundance of major functional microbial groups increased by 1.5–3.0-fold, particularly nitrogen-transforming and cellulose-degrading microorganisms. Grain yield improved significantly in both years, with the highest and most stable yields observed at 15–20 t ha−1, resulting in yield gains of 18–32% compared with the control. Yield improvements were associated with increases in grain number per spike (up to 25–27 grains) and grain weight per spike (up to 1.42–1.62 g). Higher manure rates (20–30 t ha−1) did not confer additional yield benefits. Overall, these findings indicate that moderate CCM application effectively enhances soil fertility, stimulates microbial activity, and improves wheat productivity under dryland conditions.

AgronomyVol. 16(7)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), National Center for Biotechnology (KZ), S.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University (KZ), ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Soil and Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.