A Comparative Analysis Of Plant Species Richness And Diversity In Managed Versus Unmanaged Urban Green Spaces In Botanical Gardens And In Abandoned Lots Of Lusaka, Zambia

Urban green spaces are increasingly recognised as critical reservoirs of plant biodiversity in rapidly growing cities of sub-Saharan Africa, yet comparative data on species richness and community composition across contrasting management types remain scarce for Central African cities. This study presents findings from a quantitative comparative analysis of plant species richness and diversity in managed and unmanaged urban green spaces in Lusaka, Zambia. Using a stratified random sampling design, a total of 60 vegetation quadrats (10 m by 10 m) were surveyed across two contrasting site categories: the formally managed Lusaka Botanic Garden in Longacres (n = 30 plots distributed across three management zone strata) and abandoned lots in three residential townships, namely Kalingalinga, Chilenje, and Matero (n = 10 plots per township). A structured questionnaire was administered to 35 respondents comprising garden management staff (Version A, n = 21) and lot occupants or owners (Version B, n = 14). Botanical garden plots recorded a significantly higher mean species richness of 20.9 species per plot (SD = 3.87) compared with 14.4 species per plot (SD = 1.87) in abandoned lots (Welch t-test: t(58) = 5.21, p < 0.001). Across both site types, 269 unique vascular plant taxa were recorded from 84 families. The botanical garden harboured a higher proportion of exotic and cultivated species (58.3 percent) while abandoned lots contained a significantly larger proportion of native Zambian plant species (67.9 percent). Shannon diversity indices were significantly higher in botanical garden plots (mean H\\\' = 2.70, SD = 0.15) than in abandoned lots (mean H\\\' = 2.21, SD = 0.13). Non-metric multidimensional scaling and PERMANOVA confirmed highly significant compositional differentiation between the two space types (R² = 0.310, F = 26.4, p = 0.001). Questionnaire data revealed that 85.7 percent of garden staff perceived funding constraints as limiting management intensity, and 71.4 percent of lot occupants expressed willingness to participate in community-led conservation programmes. The findings highlight that both managed and unmanaged urban green spaces in Lusaka contribute complementary and non-redundant plant diversity values, and that conservation policy must recognise both categories as components of an integrated urban biodiversity strategy.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19387577
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis Of Plant Species Richness And Diversity In Managed Versus Unmanaged Urban Green Spaces In Botanical Gardens And In Abandoned Lots Of Lusaka, Zambia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Urban Green Space and Health
article

A Comparative Analysis Of Plant Species Richness And Diversity In Managed Versus Unmanaged Urban Green Spaces In Botanical Gardens And In Abandoned Lots Of Lusaka, Zambia

article en

Abstract

Urban green spaces are increasingly recognised as critical reservoirs of plant biodiversity in rapidly growing cities of sub-Saharan Africa, yet comparative data on species richness and community composition across contrasting management types remain scarce for Central African cities. This study presents findings from a quantitative comparative analysis of plant species richness and diversity in managed and unmanaged urban green spaces in Lusaka, Zambia. Using a stratified random sampling design, a total of 60 vegetation quadrats (10 m by 10 m) were surveyed across two contrasting site categories: the formally managed Lusaka Botanic Garden in Longacres (n = 30 plots distributed across three management zone strata) and abandoned lots in three residential townships, namely Kalingalinga, Chilenje, and Matero (n = 10 plots per township). A structured questionnaire was administered to 35 respondents comprising garden management staff (Version A, n = 21) and lot occupants or owners (Version B, n = 14). Botanical garden plots recorded a significantly higher mean species richness of 20.9 species per plot (SD = 3.87) compared with 14.4 species per plot (SD = 1.87) in abandoned lots (Welch t-test: t(58) = 5.21, p < 0.001). Across both site types, 269 unique vascular plant taxa were recorded from 84 families. The botanical garden harboured a higher proportion of exotic and cultivated species (58.3 percent) while abandoned lots contained a significantly larger proportion of native Zambian plant species (67.9 percent). Shannon diversity indices were significantly higher in botanical garden plots (mean H\\\' = 2.70, SD = 0.15) than in abandoned lots (mean H\\\' = 2.21, SD = 0.13). Non-metric multidimensional scaling and PERMANOVA confirmed highly significant compositional differentiation between the two space types (R² = 0.310, F = 26.4, p = 0.001). Questionnaire data revealed that 85.7 percent of garden staff perceived funding constraints as limiting management intensity, and 71.4 percent of lot occupants expressed willingness to participate in community-led conservation programmes. The findings highlight that both managed and unmanaged urban green spaces in Lusaka contribute complementary and non-redundant plant diversity values, and that conservation policy must recognise both categories as components of an integrated urban biodiversity strategy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.