GAIF-4: Four Clinical AI Safety Metrics for Multi-Agent Clinical AI Pipelines

GAIF-4 extends the Governed AI Architecture Framework (GAIF) with four computable safety metrics for multi-agent clinical AI pipelines. Each metric addresses a distinct deployment-level failure mode invisible to standard model benchmarks: spontaneous content emergence (EMR), external contamination propagation (T1PR), protected health information leakage (CFR), and governance-change velocity mismatch (GDR). Unlike DORA metrics, which measure software delivery performance retrospectively from production data, GAIF-4 is a prospective risk assessment that measures pipeline hazards before they manifest in patient-facing systems. Based on a systematic scan of 65+ AI safety and governance frameworks, no existing framework provides a comparable set of computable, deployment-level, multi-dimensional safety metrics for clinical AI pipelines. Each metric is independently validated through separate research totaling over 300,000 API calls across multiple model families: EMR: Validated in the EMG paper (97K API calls, 4 model families, 3 topologies, 10 clinical domains) T1PR: Validated in the ContamPerc paper (210K API calls, 5 model families, 3 topologies) CFR: Validated in the PHI-GUARD paper (30K MIMIC-IV queries, zero violations, distribution-free bound) GDR: Validated in the GDR paper (65 events across 3 vendors, 12-month analysis) The specification defines normalization formulas, composite scoring, safety grades (A through F), threshold justifications, and deployment remediation guidance. All four FAIL boundaries map to 0.50 on the normalized scale, making the composite score directly interpretable. An open-source assessment toolkit with 59 passing tests is available at: https://github.com/aman210122/gaif-governance-observatory This is a companion to the GAIF v1.0 specification (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341015). Contact: [email protected] ORCID: 0009-0005-5107-4485 LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/amansharmaarchitect

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19378438
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GAIF-4: Four Clinical AI Safety Metrics for Multi-Agent Clinical AI Pipelines

Aman Sharma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

GAIF-4: Four Clinical AI Safety Metrics for Multi-Agent Clinical AI Pipelines

Aman Sharma
article en

Abstract

GAIF-4 extends the Governed AI Architecture Framework (GAIF) with four computable safety metrics for multi-agent clinical AI pipelines. Each metric addresses a distinct deployment-level failure mode invisible to standard model benchmarks: spontaneous content emergence (EMR), external contamination propagation (T1PR), protected health information leakage (CFR), and governance-change velocity mismatch (GDR). Unlike DORA metrics, which measure software delivery performance retrospectively from production data, GAIF-4 is a prospective risk assessment that measures pipeline hazards before they manifest in patient-facing systems. Based on a systematic scan of 65+ AI safety and governance frameworks, no existing framework provides a comparable set of computable, deployment-level, multi-dimensional safety metrics for clinical AI pipelines. Each metric is independently validated through separate research totaling over 300,000 API calls across multiple model families: EMR: Validated in the EMG paper (97K API calls, 4 model families, 3 topologies, 10 clinical domains) T1PR: Validated in the ContamPerc paper (210K API calls, 5 model families, 3 topologies) CFR: Validated in the PHI-GUARD paper (30K MIMIC-IV queries, zero violations, distribution-free bound) GDR: Validated in the GDR paper (65 events across 3 vendors, 12-month analysis) The specification defines normalization formulas, composite scoring, safety grades (A through F), threshold justifications, and deployment remediation guidance. All four FAIL boundaries map to 0.50 on the normalized scale, making the composite score directly interpretable. An open-source assessment toolkit with 59 passing tests is available at: https://github.com/aman210122/gaif-governance-observatory This is a companion to the GAIF v1.0 specification (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341015). Contact: [email protected] ORCID: 0009-0005-5107-4485 LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/amansharmaarchitect

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City (US), Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield (US), Blue Shield of California Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.