Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a retrospective study and meta-analysis of composite cut-off values
OBJECTIVE: To determine the composite cut-off value and diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP) for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). METHOD: A retrospective study of patients was combined with a meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated via forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. A composite cut-off model was developed using R 4.4.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria). RESULTS: The experimental cohort comprised 265 patients (204 with DFO and 61 without). The meta-analysis comprised 12 studies, including a total of 1828 patients. The retrospective cohort demonstrated that CRP achieved an AUC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55, 0.71) for diagnosing DFO, with an optimal cut-off value of 9.57mg/l (sensitivity 74%, specificity 53%). Meta-analysis revealed pooled sensitivity of 74% (63-83%) and specificity of 73% (65-79%) (AUC=0.79; 95%CI: 0.75, 0.82). The composite model suggested a CRP cut-off of 15.20mg/l (sensitivity 80%, specificity 53%). CONCLUSION: In this study, CRP demonstrated moderate diagnostic utility for DFO and could function as a screening adjunct.
Authors
- Qingzhu Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-725X)
- S. Quan
- Jing Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9392-6600)
- Jinzheng Hou
- Li Xiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7391-2070)
- Lulu Liu
- Yukun Tao
- Fang Liu
- Guangxin Zhou
- Da Zhang
Institutions
- Hebei North University (CN)
- United States Air Force (US)
- Air Force General Hospital PLA (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Wound Care
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0340
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 18.34