Systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence and prognosis of sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the incidence and prognosis of sac regression following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), focusing on mortality (all-cause and aneurysm-related), aneurysm rupture, endoleaks, and secondary interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to December 2024. Randomized trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies involving patients who underwent standard EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were included. The studies were included only if they compared patients with sac regression versus those without during follow-up. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment. The data were synthesized using a random-effects model to calculate relative risks (RR) for outcomes of interest. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 18 observational studies involving 25,984 patients were included. Sac regression was reported in 12,195 patients (46.9% [95% CI: 46.3%, 47.5%]), although with varying definitions of shrinkage through studies. Pooled analyses showed that sac regression was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (RR=0.68 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.78], P<0.001) and aneurysm rupture (RR=0.38 [95% CI: 0.15, 0.97], P=0.044). Sac regression also correlated with lower rates of endoleaks (RR=0.45 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.62], P<0.001) and secondary interventions (RR=0.40 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.52], P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm sac regression is a valuable prognostic marker after EVAR. It is associated with better clinical outcomes, including reduced mortality and complications. Standardizing the definition and assessment of sac regression is essential for more consistent findings. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to confirm these results and better understand the mechanisms behind sac regression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23736/s0021-9509.25.13366-1
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence and prognosis of sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair

Rocco Giudice, Fabrizio Minelli, Sandro Lepidi, Carlo Coscarella et al.
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence and prognosis of sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair

Rocco Giudice, Fabrizio Minelli, Sandro Lepidi, Carlo Coscarella, Giovanni Tinelli, Andrea Zito, Manav Dimri, Giuseppe BIONDI-ZOCCAI, Marco BERNARDI, Simona SICA, Mario D’ORIA, Yamume TSHOMBA
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the incidence and prognosis of sac regression following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), focusing on mortality (all-cause and aneurysm-related), aneurysm rupture, endoleaks, and secondary interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to December 2024. Randomized trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies involving patients who underwent standard EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were included. The studies were included only if they compared patients with sac regression versus those without during follow-up. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment. The data were synthesized using a random-effects model to calculate relative risks (RR) for outcomes of interest. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 18 observational studies involving 25,984 patients were included. Sac regression was reported in 12,195 patients (46.9% [95% CI: 46.3%, 47.5%]), although with varying definitions of shrinkage through studies. Pooled analyses showed that sac regression was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (RR=0.68 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.78], P<0.001) and aneurysm rupture (RR=0.38 [95% CI: 0.15, 0.97], P=0.044). Sac regression also correlated with lower rates of endoleaks (RR=0.45 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.62], P<0.001) and secondary interventions (RR=0.40 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.52], P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm sac regression is a valuable prognostic marker after EVAR. It is associated with better clinical outcomes, including reduced mortality and complications. Standardizing the definition and assessment of sac regression is essential for more consistent findings. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to confirm these results and better understand the mechanisms behind sac regression.

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Trieste (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Maria Cecilia Hospital (IT), University of the Sacred Heart (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.