The Infrastructure Harm Mechanism: Downstream Harm: A Non‑Moral Theory of Harm Production in Complex Systems

The Infrastructure Harm Mechanism formalizes a non‑moral theory of harm production in modern systems. It demonstrates that harmful outcomes do not require malicious actors but emerge predictably from misaligned upstream incentives. The work introduces and defines the Incentive Reinforcement Loop, the Minimum‑Viable Output Attractor, the Coercive System Stack, and the principle of Friction Against Correction, showing how these mechanisms stabilize degradation across institutional domains. The essay also situates contemporary structural analysis within a longer historical arc by reframing early moral sayings—such as “the devil gets to you through your pocket” and “you cannot serve both God and Mammon”—as pre‑structural attempts to describe incentive‑driven behavior. The result is a unified, mechanistic account of how institutions generate, normalize, and reproduce harm without requiring intention or malice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19391112
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Infrastructure Harm Mechanism: Downstream Harm: A Non‑Moral Theory of Harm Production in Complex Systems

Signal Rupture
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

The Infrastructure Harm Mechanism: Downstream Harm: A Non‑Moral Theory of Harm Production in Complex Systems

Signal Rupture
article en

Abstract

The Infrastructure Harm Mechanism formalizes a non‑moral theory of harm production in modern systems. It demonstrates that harmful outcomes do not require malicious actors but emerge predictably from misaligned upstream incentives. The work introduces and defines the Incentive Reinforcement Loop, the Minimum‑Viable Output Attractor, the Coercive System Stack, and the principle of Friction Against Correction, showing how these mechanisms stabilize degradation across institutional domains. The essay also situates contemporary structural analysis within a longer historical arc by reframing early moral sayings—such as “the devil gets to you through your pocket” and “you cannot serve both God and Mammon”—as pre‑structural attempts to describe incentive‑driven behavior. The result is a unified, mechanistic account of how institutions generate, normalize, and reproduce harm without requiring intention or malice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.