154. Response of Cotton to Simulated Grazing

Abstract Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a staple crop in the southeastern US. In recent years, grazing pressure from wildlife has led to stand losses and decreased yield. However, this has led to interest among researchers in exploring the viability of cotton as a potential source of livestock nutrition. Currently, there is a lack of data regarding cotton as a grazed forage. Thus, our study aimed to determine the nutritive value, regrowth potential, and cotton yield based on level of simulated grazing pressure. This experiment was conducted as a completely randomized block design with defoliation (simulated grazing) being the single treatment factor. During this study, cotton from a standard production field was divided into two, 0.08-ha blocks. These blocks were then divided into five 9 x 18 m strips, and strips were assigned to one of four defoliation treatments (above the 1st, 4th, 8th, or 12th node) or a negative, unharvested control. Cotton was allowed to grow for approximately 75 d before simulating grazing events. Immediately prior to the simulated grazing event, ten plants were selected at random in each plot. Cotton was then harvested according to the assigned treatment. Plant density (count/ha) and pre-harvest height were consistent across treatments (P > 0.77). Post-harvest heights from the 12th node were not different (P > 0.05) from the control but decreased (P < 0.05) with increasing defoliation intensity. Dry matter yield was greatest (P < 0.05) from those harvested at the 1st node (1,921 kg/ha) and decreased through the 12th node (286 kg/ha). Leaf-to-stem ratios, however, were not different (P > 0.05) across treatments. Initial results are interpreted to mean that cotton may be a viable forage crop in a dual-purpose system, but replication across years and subsequent live animal trials will be required to fully assess viability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag057.038
Primary Topic
Research in Cotton Cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

154. Response of Cotton to Simulated Grazing

Jenny Koebernick, C. H. Kyle, Marquez L Wortham, W Brandon Smith et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Research in Cotton Cultivation
article

154. Response of Cotton to Simulated Grazing

Jenny Koebernick, C. H. Kyle, Marquez L Wortham, W Brandon Smith, S Leanne Dillard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a staple crop in the southeastern US. In recent years, grazing pressure from wildlife has led to stand losses and decreased yield. However, this has led to interest among researchers in exploring the viability of cotton as a potential source of livestock nutrition. Currently, there is a lack of data regarding cotton as a grazed forage. Thus, our study aimed to determine the nutritive value, regrowth potential, and cotton yield based on level of simulated grazing pressure. This experiment was conducted as a completely randomized block design with defoliation (simulated grazing) being the single treatment factor. During this study, cotton from a standard production field was divided into two, 0.08-ha blocks. These blocks were then divided into five 9 x 18 m strips, and strips were assigned to one of four defoliation treatments (above the 1st, 4th, 8th, or 12th node) or a negative, unharvested control. Cotton was allowed to grow for approximately 75 d before simulating grazing events. Immediately prior to the simulated grazing event, ten plants were selected at random in each plot. Cotton was then harvested according to the assigned treatment. Plant density (count/ha) and pre-harvest height were consistent across treatments (P > 0.77). Post-harvest heights from the 12th node were not different (P > 0.05) from the control but decreased (P < 0.05) with increasing defoliation intensity. Dry matter yield was greatest (P < 0.05) from those harvested at the 1st node (1,921 kg/ha) and decreased through the 12th node (286 kg/ha). Leaf-to-stem ratios, however, were not different (P > 0.05) across treatments. Initial results are interpreted to mean that cotton may be a viable forage crop in a dual-purpose system, but replication across years and subsequent live animal trials will be required to fully assess viability.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_2)
Auburn University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Research in Cotton Cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

154. Response of Cotton to Simulated Grazing — Jenny Koebernick, C. H. Kyle, et al. · Journal of Animal Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS