What Explains Bitcoin Volatility? Evidence from an Extended HAR Framework

This study investigates the dynamics of Bitcoin’s realized volatility by extending the Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) framework to incorporate external shocks from major financial and commodity markets, namely the NASDAQ-100, Brent crude oil, and gold. To capture potential asymmetries, external market returns are decomposed into positive and negative components. In addition, structural changes in volatility dynamics are examined using structural break tests. The empirical results reveal strong volatility persistence at the daily and weekly horizons, consistent with the HAR structure. Shocks associated with the NASDAQ and gold markets are significantly related to Bitcoin’s realized volatility, whereas the association with crude oil prices is limited. Moreover, both negative and positive gold-market shocks display stronger linkages in the post-2022 period, suggesting time variation in the volatility relationship between Bitcoin and gold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs14040081
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Explains Bitcoin Volatility? Evidence from an Extended HAR Framework

Yuanju Fang, Zhaoying Lu
International Journal of Financial Studies
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

What Explains Bitcoin Volatility? Evidence from an Extended HAR Framework

Yuanju Fang, Zhaoying Lu
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics of Bitcoin’s realized volatility by extending the Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) framework to incorporate external shocks from major financial and commodity markets, namely the NASDAQ-100, Brent crude oil, and gold. To capture potential asymmetries, external market returns are decomposed into positive and negative components. In addition, structural changes in volatility dynamics are examined using structural break tests. The empirical results reveal strong volatility persistence at the daily and weekly horizons, consistent with the HAR structure. Shocks associated with the NASDAQ and gold markets are significantly related to Bitcoin’s realized volatility, whereas the association with crude oil prices is limited. Moreover, both negative and positive gold-market shocks display stronger linkages in the post-2022 period, suggesting time variation in the volatility relationship between Bitcoin and gold.

International Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 14(4)
University of Nagasaki (JP), Seigakuin University (JP)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.