Modeling and control of a nuclear pressurized water reactor using advanced model predictive control strategies

The nonlinear dynamics and multiple interacting loops in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) make control design challenging, particularly when load-following and safety constraints must be handled simultaneously. Building on the detailed 27-state PWR model developed by Vajpayee et al. (2020), this paper presents a MATLAB/Simulink implementation of the complete reactor-steam-generator-pressurizer system, utilizing it as a benchmark to compare several standard control strategies. The model includes point-kinetics, thermal–hydraulic, piping, plenum, steam-generator, and pressurizer dynamics, and is validated against the transient responses reported in Vajpayee et al. (2020) for rod, heater, turbine-valve, and feedwater disturbances. Four controllers are implemented for the same multivariable control problem (reactor power, pressurizer pressure, steam pressure, and pressurizer level): a proportional-integral (PI) controller, a linear model predictive controller (MPC), a gain-scheduled MPC (GSMPC), and a nonlinear MPC (NMPC). These controllers were tested under 2 scenarios: power ramping (up and down) to evaluate their regulatory performance and feed-water disturbances to evaluate disturbance rejection. For each controller, we document the design workflow, tuning parameters, and constraints. Closed-loop performance is evaluated using standard integral error indices and selected load-following and disturbance-rejection scenarios, together with average computation time per sampling instant. The results show that, with fair tuning, MPC-based strategies significantly reduce power-tracking integral time absolute error and settling time compared with PI control, while GSMPC can approximate NMPC performance over a wide operating range at lower computational cost, which proves its feasibility for real-time applications. The implementation details and benchmark scenarios provided here are intended to support reproducible studies and further development of advanced control methods for PWRs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Energy
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2026.100597
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and control of a nuclear pressurized water reactor using advanced model predictive control strategies

Ghassan Murad, Mohamed A. Rahim, Mohamad Badii, MB Shams et al.
Next Energy
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
article

Modeling and control of a nuclear pressurized water reactor using advanced model predictive control strategies

Ghassan Murad, Mohamed A. Rahim, Mohamad Badii, MB Shams, Mohamed Jaafar, Ayman Saeed
article en

Abstract

The nonlinear dynamics and multiple interacting loops in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) make control design challenging, particularly when load-following and safety constraints must be handled simultaneously. Building on the detailed 27-state PWR model developed by Vajpayee et al. (2020), this paper presents a MATLAB/Simulink implementation of the complete reactor-steam-generator-pressurizer system, utilizing it as a benchmark to compare several standard control strategies. The model includes point-kinetics, thermal–hydraulic, piping, plenum, steam-generator, and pressurizer dynamics, and is validated against the transient responses reported in Vajpayee et al. (2020) for rod, heater, turbine-valve, and feedwater disturbances. Four controllers are implemented for the same multivariable control problem (reactor power, pressurizer pressure, steam pressure, and pressurizer level): a proportional-integral (PI) controller, a linear model predictive controller (MPC), a gain-scheduled MPC (GSMPC), and a nonlinear MPC (NMPC). These controllers were tested under 2 scenarios: power ramping (up and down) to evaluate their regulatory performance and feed-water disturbances to evaluate disturbance rejection. For each controller, we document the design workflow, tuning parameters, and constraints. Closed-loop performance is evaluated using standard integral error indices and selected load-following and disturbance-rejection scenarios, together with average computation time per sampling instant. The results show that, with fair tuning, MPC-based strategies significantly reduce power-tracking integral time absolute error and settling time compared with PI control, while GSMPC can approximate NMPC performance over a wide operating range at lower computational cost, which proves its feasibility for real-time applications. The implementation details and benchmark scenarios provided here are intended to support reproducible studies and further development of advanced control methods for PWRs.

Next EnergyVol. 11
University of Bahrain (BH)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.