Overview and update: Quality indicators for preregistration nursing students’ professional experience placement

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Background</h3> During mandatory clinical placements, nursing students learn to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing practice to meet the conditions for nurse registration. Reporting of placement quality indicators informs ways to enhance the student experience. <h3>Aim</h3> This study aims to provide an overview and update on quality indicators for nursing students' education experience during placement. <h3>Methods</h3> ‘Student satisfaction' and ‘Quality of placement experience' are quality indicators. A descriptive narrative approach explores related primary research between 2015 and 2025. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-nine cohort and cross-sectional surveys of nursing students were included. Most (N=19) used the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale. Across different settings, student satisfaction was mostly positive, with a mean of 4.0 out of a possible five points; lower means were seen in eight studies. Individual studies reporting quality ratings of placement experience returned a mean of 79%, despite lower mean scores in 14 studies. A national standard is identified from two Australian studies. Over 37,000 placements evaluated by Australian nursing students in 2023 and 2024 record a mean satisfaction with clinical placement of 8.3 out of a possible 10 points (4.15 out of 5 points), and a mean quality of the overall placement experience of 87%. <h3>Discussion</h3> Studies report moderate to high satisfaction and moderate quality evaluations. Less positive satisfaction and quality ratings (lower than the average), when reported, are concerning. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Students' satisfaction ratings and placement experience are confirmed as a key concept to inform the quality of students' learning, assisting efforts by educators and institutions to improve the nursing students' experiences even further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2026.03.003
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overview and update: Quality indicators for preregistration nursing students’ professional experience placement

Robyn Cant, Colleen Ryan
Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia
Nursing education and management
article

Overview and update: Quality indicators for preregistration nursing students’ professional experience placement

Robyn Cant, Colleen Ryan
article en

Abstract

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Background</h3> During mandatory clinical placements, nursing students learn to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing practice to meet the conditions for nurse registration. Reporting of placement quality indicators informs ways to enhance the student experience. <h3>Aim</h3> This study aims to provide an overview and update on quality indicators for nursing students' education experience during placement. <h3>Methods</h3> ‘Student satisfaction' and ‘Quality of placement experience' are quality indicators. A descriptive narrative approach explores related primary research between 2015 and 2025. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-nine cohort and cross-sectional surveys of nursing students were included. Most (N=19) used the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale. Across different settings, student satisfaction was mostly positive, with a mean of 4.0 out of a possible five points; lower means were seen in eight studies. Individual studies reporting quality ratings of placement experience returned a mean of 79%, despite lower mean scores in 14 studies. A national standard is identified from two Australian studies. Over 37,000 placements evaluated by Australian nursing students in 2023 and 2024 record a mean satisfaction with clinical placement of 8.3 out of a possible 10 points (4.15 out of 5 points), and a mean quality of the overall placement experience of 87%. <h3>Discussion</h3> Studies report moderate to high satisfaction and moderate quality evaluations. Less positive satisfaction and quality ratings (lower than the average), when reported, are concerning. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Students' satisfaction ratings and placement experience are confirmed as a key concept to inform the quality of students' learning, assisting efforts by educators and institutions to improve the nursing students' experiences even further.

Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia
Federation University (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.