Functional asymmetries in inside-outside foot mechanics when curvilinear sprinting in baseball

The purpose of this study was to determine whether inside-outside foot asymmetries were observed when running multiple bases in baseball. Fifty-four trained male high school baseball position players performed two linear 54.7-meter sprints and two home-to-second base sprints. Ground contact time (GCT), stride length (SL), and average push-off and impact were quantified using inertial measurement unit foot pod technology. The sprints were divided into four segments (0–13.7 m; 13.7–27.4 m; 27.4–41.1 m; 41.1–54.7 m) for both curvilinear segments (C):C1–C4, and linear segments (L):L1–L4. The primary findings of this study were that for linear sprinting, GCT was not significantly different between feet across all segments, but SL was significantly shorter (L2–L4) in the outside foot (−0.76% to −1.34%; ES = −0.20 to −0.37) and push-off were significantly greater (L1–L4) in the outside foot (2.95% to 4.39%; ES = 0.27 to 0.40), with significantly greater outside-foot impact only in L1 (5.63%; ES = 0.29). In curvilinear sprinting, the inside foot was found to have significantly longer GCT in Segments 2–4 (−3.13% to −7.79%; ES = −0.38 to −1.29), higher push-off (3.83% to 4.39%; ES = 0.31 to 0.41), and segment-specific SL changes. Inside–outside foot asymmetries are driven by the linear-curvilinear demands of specific segments, peaking in Segment 3 where stabilization demands are greatest. These findings highlight the need for segment-specific training that develops inside-foot stability and outside-foot propulsion to optimize base-running performance in base runners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asymmetry.
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55092/asymmetry20260001
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional asymmetries in inside-outside foot mechanics when curvilinear sprinting in baseball

José Antonio Martínez-Rodríguez, Jonathon Neville, John Cronin
Asymmetry.
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Functional asymmetries in inside-outside foot mechanics when curvilinear sprinting in baseball

José Antonio Martínez-Rodríguez, Jonathon Neville, John Cronin
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether inside-outside foot asymmetries were observed when running multiple bases in baseball. Fifty-four trained male high school baseball position players performed two linear 54.7-meter sprints and two home-to-second base sprints. Ground contact time (GCT), stride length (SL), and average push-off and impact were quantified using inertial measurement unit foot pod technology. The sprints were divided into four segments (0–13.7 m; 13.7–27.4 m; 27.4–41.1 m; 41.1–54.7 m) for both curvilinear segments (C):C1–C4, and linear segments (L):L1–L4. The primary findings of this study were that for linear sprinting, GCT was not significantly different between feet across all segments, but SL was significantly shorter (L2–L4) in the outside foot (−0.76% to −1.34%; ES = −0.20 to −0.37) and push-off were significantly greater (L1–L4) in the outside foot (2.95% to 4.39%; ES = 0.27 to 0.40), with significantly greater outside-foot impact only in L1 (5.63%; ES = 0.29). In curvilinear sprinting, the inside foot was found to have significantly longer GCT in Segments 2–4 (−3.13% to −7.79%; ES = −0.38 to −1.29), higher push-off (3.83% to 4.39%; ES = 0.31 to 0.41), and segment-specific SL changes. Inside–outside foot asymmetries are driven by the linear-curvilinear demands of specific segments, peaking in Segment 3 where stabilization demands are greatest. These findings highlight the need for segment-specific training that develops inside-foot stability and outside-foot propulsion to optimize base-running performance in base runners.

Asymmetry.
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.