Core Practice Principles: A mixed-methods approach to determine what drives the use of seated trunk control assessments in spinal cord injury clinical and research practice.

OBJECTIVE: To examine current practices in assessing seated trunk control (STC) following spinal cord injury (SCI), a key factor in rehabilitation outcomes and independence. Enablers and barriers to uptake of assessment tools in practice were identified using the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) and mapped to the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation for Behavior Change (COM-B) model. DESIGN: Explanatory sequential mixed methods design using a survey of assessment tools used, followed by focus groups and interviews to triangulate survey responses, understand factors driving uptake, and identify ideal assessment characteristics. SETTING: Leading SCI institutions in the United States PARTICIPANTS: US-based clinicians and clinical researchers experienced in SCI rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: NA MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey of commonly used assessment tools. RESULTS: The survey showed that 72% of 67 respondents used STC assessments, most frequently the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), while qualitative findings highlighted the FIST-SCI and observation as key assessments of STC. Analysis using the TDF and COM-B identified barriers relating to Opportunity to use STC assessments: including limited evidence, absence of standardized guidelines, funding constraints, and insurance limitations. Capability-related facilitators to use of assessments were practitioner knowledge and practical skills, whereas Motivation-related drivers were clinical relevance and sensitivity to change of assessments. CONCLUSION: In SCI rehabilitation in the US health care context, trunk control assessment is considered essential, although systemic and evidentiary challenges limit its integration. These findings underscore the need for co-developed guidelines and further research to demonstrate the robustness of assessments in monitoring progress, fall risk, and activity independence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2026.03.017
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Core Practice Principles: A mixed-methods approach to determine what drives the use of seated trunk control assessments in spinal cord injury clinical and research practice.

Edward James R. Gorgon, Anne E. Palermo, Keith M. D. McNaughton, Georgia Fisher et al.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Core Practice Principles: A mixed-methods approach to determine what drives the use of seated trunk control assessments in spinal cord injury clinical and research practice.

Edward James R. Gorgon, Anne E. Palermo, Keith M. D. McNaughton, Georgia Fisher, Riley Nicholson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine current practices in assessing seated trunk control (STC) following spinal cord injury (SCI), a key factor in rehabilitation outcomes and independence. Enablers and barriers to uptake of assessment tools in practice were identified using the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) and mapped to the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation for Behavior Change (COM-B) model. DESIGN: Explanatory sequential mixed methods design using a survey of assessment tools used, followed by focus groups and interviews to triangulate survey responses, understand factors driving uptake, and identify ideal assessment characteristics. SETTING: Leading SCI institutions in the United States PARTICIPANTS: US-based clinicians and clinical researchers experienced in SCI rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: NA MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey of commonly used assessment tools. RESULTS: The survey showed that 72% of 67 respondents used STC assessments, most frequently the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), while qualitative findings highlighted the FIST-SCI and observation as key assessments of STC. Analysis using the TDF and COM-B identified barriers relating to Opportunity to use STC assessments: including limited evidence, absence of standardized guidelines, funding constraints, and insurance limitations. Capability-related facilitators to use of assessments were practitioner knowledge and practical skills, whereas Motivation-related drivers were clinical relevance and sensitivity to change of assessments. CONCLUSION: In SCI rehabilitation in the US health care context, trunk control assessment is considered essential, although systemic and evidentiary challenges limit its integration. These findings underscore the need for co-developed guidelines and further research to demonstrate the robustness of assessments in monitoring progress, fall risk, and activity independence.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
The University of Sydney (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Queensland University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.