Interactive Effects of Irrigation Amount and Interval on Cotton Water Use and Productivity: Evidence from Controlled Experiments and AquaCrop Simulations

In arid and semi-arid regions, improving water use irrigation efficiency under limited seasonal water supply is critical for sustainable cotton production. While the effects of seasonal irrigation amount have been widely studied, the independent and interactive roles of irrigation interval under a fixed seasonal irrigation constraint remain insufficiently quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how irrigation amount and interval jointly regulate soil water dynamics, evapotranspiration partitioning, yield formation, and water use efficiency (WUE) in cotton. A two-year, controlled soil-column experiment was conducted using a full-factorial design with two seasonal irrigation amounts (350 and 200 mm) and four irrigation intervals (every 3, 6, 9, or 12 days). The AquaCrop model was locally calibrated with 2024 data and validated with independent 2025 observations. The validated model was then used to conduct scenario simulations across 16 irrigation combinations to analyze process-level responses. The model reproduced canopy cover and soil water storage (SWS) dynamics with good accuracy (R2 > 0.89; NRMSE < 16%). The results showed that irrigation amount primarily controlled overall water availability, whereas irrigation interval reshaped the temporal fluctuation pattern of soil water content (SWC) in the shallow root zone. Under moderate irrigation levels, an intermediate interval (every 6 days) improved WUE by stabilizing SWC and maintaining high transpiration proportions. Under severe deficit conditions, prolonged intervals intensified periodic water stress and reduced yield. Simulated transpiration accounted for 95–97% of seasonal evapotranspiration in the controlled system, reflecting limited soil evaporation under column conditions. These findings highlight that irrigation interval, beyond total irrigation amount, is an important management variable for optimizing cotton irrigation scheduling under water-limited conditions. The combined experimental and modeling framework provides practical guidance for irrigation design in arid regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16070730
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactive Effects of Irrigation Amount and Interval on Cotton Water Use and Productivity: Evidence from Controlled Experiments and AquaCrop Simulations

Yabing Li, K. M. Li, Qiuxiang Tang, Tao Lin et al.
Agronomy
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Interactive Effects of Irrigation Amount and Interval on Cotton Water Use and Productivity: Evidence from Controlled Experiments and AquaCrop Simulations

Yabing Li, K. M. Li, Qiuxiang Tang, Tao Lin, Na Su, Yushui Duan, Yanyan Xie, Hanjing Chen, Zhiyi Lv, Jiaqi Li, Hao Zhang
article en

Abstract

In arid and semi-arid regions, improving water use irrigation efficiency under limited seasonal water supply is critical for sustainable cotton production. While the effects of seasonal irrigation amount have been widely studied, the independent and interactive roles of irrigation interval under a fixed seasonal irrigation constraint remain insufficiently quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how irrigation amount and interval jointly regulate soil water dynamics, evapotranspiration partitioning, yield formation, and water use efficiency (WUE) in cotton. A two-year, controlled soil-column experiment was conducted using a full-factorial design with two seasonal irrigation amounts (350 and 200 mm) and four irrigation intervals (every 3, 6, 9, or 12 days). The AquaCrop model was locally calibrated with 2024 data and validated with independent 2025 observations. The validated model was then used to conduct scenario simulations across 16 irrigation combinations to analyze process-level responses. The model reproduced canopy cover and soil water storage (SWS) dynamics with good accuracy (R2 > 0.89; NRMSE < 16%). The results showed that irrigation amount primarily controlled overall water availability, whereas irrigation interval reshaped the temporal fluctuation pattern of soil water content (SWC) in the shallow root zone. Under moderate irrigation levels, an intermediate interval (every 6 days) improved WUE by stabilizing SWC and maintaining high transpiration proportions. Under severe deficit conditions, prolonged intervals intensified periodic water stress and reduced yield. Simulated transpiration accounted for 95–97% of seasonal evapotranspiration in the controlled system, reflecting limited soil evaporation under column conditions. These findings highlight that irrigation interval, beyond total irrigation amount, is an important management variable for optimizing cotton irrigation scheduling under water-limited conditions. The combined experimental and modeling framework provides practical guidance for irrigation design in arid regions.

AgronomyVol. 16(7)
Xinjiang Agricultural University (CN), Cotton Research Institute (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.