From Prakriti to Ecology: Elemental Ontology and Environmental Responsibility in Indian Philosophy

Abstract: This paper explores classical Indian philosophy’s contribution to contemporary environmental ethics by analyzing Prakṛti and the Pañcamahābhūta (the five great elements). It argues that Sāṃkhya and Vedānta traditions establish a "relational ontology," where humans and nature share the same structural constitution. Under this framework, ecological responsibility is not an external moral duty but an internal implication of our shared metaphysical identity. By grounding environmental obligation in the principle of dharma, this model challenges anthropocentric and mechanistic views of nature. The study further engages with Western concepts like Deep Ecology and the Land Ethic, noting that while they share similar goals, the Indian model uniquely roots ethics in metaphysical unity rather than moral expansion. Ultimately, the paper suggests that this holistic elemental ontology offers a vital conceptual foundation for global sustainability and addressing the modern climate crisis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19388942
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Prakriti to Ecology: Elemental Ontology and Environmental Responsibility in Indian Philosophy

Sudip Ghosh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

From Prakriti to Ecology: Elemental Ontology and Environmental Responsibility in Indian Philosophy

Sudip Ghosh
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This paper explores classical Indian philosophy’s contribution to contemporary environmental ethics by analyzing Prakṛti and the Pañcamahābhūta (the five great elements). It argues that Sāṃkhya and Vedānta traditions establish a "relational ontology," where humans and nature share the same structural constitution. Under this framework, ecological responsibility is not an external moral duty but an internal implication of our shared metaphysical identity. By grounding environmental obligation in the principle of dharma, this model challenges anthropocentric and mechanistic views of nature. The study further engages with Western concepts like Deep Ecology and the Land Ethic, noting that while they share similar goals, the Indian model uniquely roots ethics in metaphysical unity rather than moral expansion. Ultimately, the paper suggests that this holistic elemental ontology offers a vital conceptual foundation for global sustainability and addressing the modern climate crisis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.