Distinguishing Natural and Anthropogenic stressors at a Groundwater–Surface Water Interface Using a Weight-of-Evidence Framework

This study applied a tiered weight‑of‑evidence (WoE) framework to evaluate whether contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) - chloride, ammonia, total dissolved solids, and elevated pH-transported through groundwater-surface water interactions contribute to benthic impairment at a calcium chloride production site. The assessment focused on five test stations (A to E) near suspected discharge zones and upstream reference sites within a drowned river‑mouth wetland, allowing comparison of exposure and biological responses across a hydrologic gradient. Four lines of evidence (LOEs) were integrated to distinguish natural and anthropogenic stressors influencing benthic macroinvertebrate communities: (1) physicochemical characterization of COPCs; (2) benthic community assessments using indices of biotic integrity based on the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols and the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, along with reciprocal recolonization studies; (3) in situ toxicity testing; and (4) laboratory microcosm tests simulating contaminant upwelling under reasonable worst-case (RWC) conditions. Surface water pH remained within acceptable limits, whereas chloride and ammonia exceeded the Michigan EGLE regulatory thresholds at stations D and E. Ammonia concentrations exceeded the acute criterion at station E and the chronic criterion at station D. Both stations also experienced nighttime hypoxia (<1 mg L-1 DO). In situ toxicity tests implicated low DO and elevated ammonia as primary stressors, and microcosm experiments confirmed ammonia-related toxicity under RWC conditions. Benthic bioassessment indices and recolonization studies indicated moderate to severe impairment at stations D and E, while upstream and less-affected stations exhibited communities consistent with reference conditions. A fourth-phase investigation further confirmed DO depletion as a dominant stressor at station E, which showed the highest contaminant levels and the most impaired benthic communities (Nichols et al. 2024). Overall, these findings highlight the value of a site‑specific WoE framework for distinguishing natural variability from legacy contamination in complex wetland environments and show how iterative refinement improves stressor identification and reduces misinterpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag056
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing Natural and Anthropogenic stressors at a Groundwater–Surface Water Interface Using a Weight-of-Evidence Framework

Sara Nedrich, Rachel Zajac-Fay, E C Cervi, G Allen Burton et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
article

Distinguishing Natural and Anthropogenic stressors at a Groundwater–Surface Water Interface Using a Weight-of-Evidence Framework

Sara Nedrich, Rachel Zajac-Fay, E C Cervi, G Allen Burton, D R Lavoie, S S Brown
article en

Abstract

This study applied a tiered weight‑of‑evidence (WoE) framework to evaluate whether contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) - chloride, ammonia, total dissolved solids, and elevated pH-transported through groundwater-surface water interactions contribute to benthic impairment at a calcium chloride production site. The assessment focused on five test stations (A to E) near suspected discharge zones and upstream reference sites within a drowned river‑mouth wetland, allowing comparison of exposure and biological responses across a hydrologic gradient. Four lines of evidence (LOEs) were integrated to distinguish natural and anthropogenic stressors influencing benthic macroinvertebrate communities: (1) physicochemical characterization of COPCs; (2) benthic community assessments using indices of biotic integrity based on the Rapid Bioassessment Protocols and the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program, along with reciprocal recolonization studies; (3) in situ toxicity testing; and (4) laboratory microcosm tests simulating contaminant upwelling under reasonable worst-case (RWC) conditions. Surface water pH remained within acceptable limits, whereas chloride and ammonia exceeded the Michigan EGLE regulatory thresholds at stations D and E. Ammonia concentrations exceeded the acute criterion at station E and the chronic criterion at station D. Both stations also experienced nighttime hypoxia (<1 mg L-1 DO). In situ toxicity tests implicated low DO and elevated ammonia as primary stressors, and microcosm experiments confirmed ammonia-related toxicity under RWC conditions. Benthic bioassessment indices and recolonization studies indicated moderate to severe impairment at stations D and E, while upstream and less-affected stations exhibited communities consistent with reference conditions. A fourth-phase investigation further confirmed DO depletion as a dominant stressor at station E, which showed the highest contaminant levels and the most impaired benthic communities (Nichols et al. 2024). Overall, these findings highlight the value of a site‑specific WoE framework for distinguishing natural variability from legacy contamination in complex wetland environments and show how iterative refinement improves stressor identification and reduces misinterpretation.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Dow Chemical (India) (IN), Michigan Department of Natural Resources (US), University of Michigan (US), Seattle Reproductive Medicine (US), Dow Chemical (Canada) (CA), Dow Chemical (United States) (US), Geosyntec Consultants (United States) (US), Jacobs (United States) (US), WSP (Canada) (CA)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.