Electroacupuncture improves cognitive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded pilot trial to compare the impact of two electroacupuncture (EA) regimens on co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms among breast cancer survivors (BCS). METHODS: BCS who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sEA) acupoints. Primary endpoints were the within-group pre-post effect sizes (Glass's Δ) in symptom severities, adjusted for multiple comparisons (p-adjusted). Outcomes were assessed using neurocognitive tests (CANTAB®), PROs (FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF, EORTC QLQ-C30), plasma biomarkers, and neuroimaging. Responders were defined by reliable change index (for objective cognition) or MCID (for PROs). RESULTS: Thirty-five were recruited, with 30 (86%) completing all sessions. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2 (±12.2) years, and 86% reported co-occurring symptoms. Following treatment, the nEA group demonstrated significant improvements in attention (T3: Δ = 0.562, T4: Δ = 0.708, both p-adjusted < 0.05) and distress (T3: Δ = 0.764, T4: Δ = 0.711, both p-adjusted < 0.05). More responders were observed after nEA treatment for objective cognition (42.9% vs 12.5%) and distress (50% vs 37.5%). nEA-treated participants showed increased gray matter volume compared to sEA (p = 0.033), which positively correlated with better attention function (r = 0.69, p = 0.020). nEA-related improvements in memory and response speed were associated with reduced connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN-SFG, r=-0.93, p < 0.01) and increased connectivity in the Dorsal Attention Network (DAN-SMG, r = 0.86, p < 0.001), respectively. All adverse events were grade 2 or lower. CONCLUSIONS: EA targeting neuropsychiatric-specific acupoints suggests improvements in cognition and distress symptoms in BCS, warranting validation in larger, multicenter trials. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05283577.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag096
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electroacupuncture improves cognitive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Shaista Malik, Julia Trudeau, Brock Pluimer, Munjal M. Acharya et al.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
article

Electroacupuncture improves cognitive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Shaista Malik, Julia Trudeau, Brock Pluimer, Munjal M. Acharya, Sayeh Lavasani, Richard Harris, Matthew Heshmatipour, Ding Quan Ng, Apeksha Sridhar, Charles L. Limoli, Ritesh Parajuli, Lifang Xie, Olivia G G Drayson, Alexandre Chan, Sanghoon Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded pilot trial to compare the impact of two electroacupuncture (EA) regimens on co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms among breast cancer survivors (BCS). METHODS: BCS who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sEA) acupoints. Primary endpoints were the within-group pre-post effect sizes (Glass's Δ) in symptom severities, adjusted for multiple comparisons (p-adjusted). Outcomes were assessed using neurocognitive tests (CANTAB®), PROs (FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF, EORTC QLQ-C30), plasma biomarkers, and neuroimaging. Responders were defined by reliable change index (for objective cognition) or MCID (for PROs). RESULTS: Thirty-five were recruited, with 30 (86%) completing all sessions. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2 (±12.2) years, and 86% reported co-occurring symptoms. Following treatment, the nEA group demonstrated significant improvements in attention (T3: Δ = 0.562, T4: Δ = 0.708, both p-adjusted < 0.05) and distress (T3: Δ = 0.764, T4: Δ = 0.711, both p-adjusted < 0.05). More responders were observed after nEA treatment for objective cognition (42.9% vs 12.5%) and distress (50% vs 37.5%). nEA-treated participants showed increased gray matter volume compared to sEA (p = 0.033), which positively correlated with better attention function (r = 0.69, p = 0.020). nEA-related improvements in memory and response speed were associated with reduced connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN-SFG, r=-0.93, p < 0.01) and increased connectivity in the Dorsal Attention Network (DAN-SMG, r = 0.86, p < 0.001), respectively. All adverse events were grade 2 or lower. CONCLUSIONS: EA targeting neuropsychiatric-specific acupoints suggests improvements in cognition and distress symptoms in BCS, warranting validation in larger, multicenter trials. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05283577.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
University of California, Irvine (US), Kyung Hee University (KR), Samueli Institute (US)
California Breast Cancer Research Program
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.