38. Effects of Feeding a Bacillus-based Probiotic on Nutrient Utilization and Microbiota Profile in the Rumen and Reproductive Tract of Beef Heifers Receiving a Forage-based Diet

Abstract This experiment evaluated the effects of feeding a Bacillus-based probiotic on rumen fermentation traits, apparent nutrient digestibility, microbiota profile in the rumen and reproductive tract of beef heifers receiving a forage-based diet. Sixteen rumen-cannulated, pubertal Angus-influenced heifers were used in a crossover design (35-d periods). Treatments included hay and concentrate (CON; n = 16) or CON with the addition of 3 g/head daily of Bacillus-based probiotic (BAC; n = 16). Blood samples were collected on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35. Rumen fluid samples were collected on d 0, 14, and 28. Vaginal and uterine swabs were collected on d 28. On d 32 of each period, ruminal liquid fill, liquid dilution rate, forage dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) disappearance were assessed for 96 h. Apparent total-tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients was calculated using fecal samples collected from d 32 to 35. Data were analyzed using heifer as the experimental unit, and results from d 0 as covariate when appropriate. Ruminal fluid pH and ammonia concentrations did not differ between treatments (P ≥ 0.28). Acetate proportion in the ruminal fluid was reduced (P < 0.01), whereas rumen propionate, butyrate, and iso-valerate proportions were increased (P ≤ 0.05) in BAC heifers. No treatment differences were observed (P ≥ 0.14) for rumen fluid phyla. Relative abundances of the genera Bacteroides, Pedobacter, and Clostridium were less (P ≤ 0.04) in the rumen fluid of BAC heifers. Rumen liquid volume and dilution rate were not affected (P ≥ 0.63) by treatments. Heifers assigned to BAC had greater (P ≤ 0.04) effective ruminal degradability of DM and NDF, as well as ATTD of DM, CP, and NDF. Mean plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.04) while mean blood urea-N concentration was less (P < 0.01) in BAC heifers. Plasma IGF-I concentration was greater (P = 0.04) in BAC heifers on d 21 (treatment × day; P = 0.04). Heifers receiving BAC had reduced (P = 0.05) abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes, and reduced (P ≤ 0.05) abundance of the genera Pedobacter and Bacteroides in vaginal swabs. No treatment effects were observed (P ≥ 0.29) for phyla or genera relative abundances in uterine swabs. Supplementing a Bacillus-based probiotic improved nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation traits, and physiological responses of beef heifers consuming a forage-based diet, with effects on the reproductive tract limited to the vaginal microbiota.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag057.019
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

38. Effects of Feeding a Bacillus-based Probiotic on Nutrient Utilization and Microbiota Profile in the Rumen and Reproductive Tract of Beef Heifers Receiving a Forage-based Diet

Joao M. B. Vendramini, Reinaldo Fernandes Cooke, Shea Mackey, Zachary K Seekford et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

38. Effects of Feeding a Bacillus-based Probiotic on Nutrient Utilization and Microbiota Profile in the Rumen and Reproductive Tract of Beef Heifers Receiving a Forage-based Diet

Joao M. B. Vendramini, Reinaldo Fernandes Cooke, Shea Mackey, Zachary K Seekford, Izadora S de Souza, K. Pohler, T. Minela, Kelsey M M Harvey
article en

Abstract

Abstract This experiment evaluated the effects of feeding a Bacillus-based probiotic on rumen fermentation traits, apparent nutrient digestibility, microbiota profile in the rumen and reproductive tract of beef heifers receiving a forage-based diet. Sixteen rumen-cannulated, pubertal Angus-influenced heifers were used in a crossover design (35-d periods). Treatments included hay and concentrate (CON; n = 16) or CON with the addition of 3 g/head daily of Bacillus-based probiotic (BAC; n = 16). Blood samples were collected on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35. Rumen fluid samples were collected on d 0, 14, and 28. Vaginal and uterine swabs were collected on d 28. On d 32 of each period, ruminal liquid fill, liquid dilution rate, forage dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) disappearance were assessed for 96 h. Apparent total-tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients was calculated using fecal samples collected from d 32 to 35. Data were analyzed using heifer as the experimental unit, and results from d 0 as covariate when appropriate. Ruminal fluid pH and ammonia concentrations did not differ between treatments (P ≥ 0.28). Acetate proportion in the ruminal fluid was reduced (P < 0.01), whereas rumen propionate, butyrate, and iso-valerate proportions were increased (P ≤ 0.05) in BAC heifers. No treatment differences were observed (P ≥ 0.14) for rumen fluid phyla. Relative abundances of the genera Bacteroides, Pedobacter, and Clostridium were less (P ≤ 0.04) in the rumen fluid of BAC heifers. Rumen liquid volume and dilution rate were not affected (P ≥ 0.63) by treatments. Heifers assigned to BAC had greater (P ≤ 0.04) effective ruminal degradability of DM and NDF, as well as ATTD of DM, CP, and NDF. Mean plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.04) while mean blood urea-N concentration was less (P < 0.01) in BAC heifers. Plasma IGF-I concentration was greater (P = 0.04) in BAC heifers on d 21 (treatment × day; P = 0.04). Heifers receiving BAC had reduced (P = 0.05) abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes, and reduced (P ≤ 0.05) abundance of the genera Pedobacter and Bacteroides in vaginal swabs. No treatment effects were observed (P ≥ 0.29) for phyla or genera relative abundances in uterine swabs. Supplementing a Bacillus-based probiotic improved nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation traits, and physiological responses of beef heifers consuming a forage-based diet, with effects on the reproductive tract limited to the vaginal microbiota.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_2)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.