Modeling Ganymede's Surface Charging in Preparation for the JUICE Mission

Abstract The European Space Agency's (ESA) JUICE mission (JUpiter ICy moons Explorer) is en route to the Jovian system to characterize Ganymede's subsurface ocean. Determining the ocean's conductivity and depth requires precise measurements of its induced magnetic field at the position of JUICE. Electron reflectometry provides additional constraints for the surface magnetic field, but this would require knowledge of Ganymede's surface electric potential. Here, we model the global electrostatic surface potential distribution on Ganymede using a semi‐analytical charging formulation, by feeding it with surface plasma environment parameters derived from different magnetospheric interaction simulations. We further contrast these estimates against self‐consistent charging simulations using the Spacecraft Plasma Interaction Software (SPIS). Our results indicate that surface potentials should be mostly negative, ranging down to about −100 V. All model predictions exhibit a consistent morphological trend: closed field line regions are more negatively charged than open field line ones. Depending on the input used, the driver behind this trend can either be the spatial variations of plasma density alone or combined density and electron temperature patterns, especially in the ionosphere; the electron current is the dominant driver of surface potential, with the relative influence of secondary electron, ion, and photoelectron currents varying depending on the location at Ganymede. While estimates of absolute surface potential are consistent with aspects of Juno flyby data, they are heavily dependent on how simulated plasma parameters are extrapolated to Ganymede's surface. Consequently, advanced modeling is required to achieve more reliable constraints of Ganymede's near‐surface environment description.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja035016
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Ganymede's Surface Charging in Preparation for the JUICE Mission

Tom Nordheim, M. Fräenz, E. Roussos, M. K. G. Holmberg et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Modeling Ganymede's Surface Charging in Preparation for the JUICE Mission

Tom Nordheim, M. Fräenz, E. Roussos, M. K. G. Holmberg, Betty Pei‐Chun Tsai, Sachin Alexander Reddy, Ronan Modolo, Yasuhito Narita, Norbert Krupp, Christina Plainaki, Xianzhe Jia
article en

Abstract

Abstract The European Space Agency's (ESA) JUICE mission (JUpiter ICy moons Explorer) is en route to the Jovian system to characterize Ganymede's subsurface ocean. Determining the ocean's conductivity and depth requires precise measurements of its induced magnetic field at the position of JUICE. Electron reflectometry provides additional constraints for the surface magnetic field, but this would require knowledge of Ganymede's surface electric potential. Here, we model the global electrostatic surface potential distribution on Ganymede using a semi‐analytical charging formulation, by feeding it with surface plasma environment parameters derived from different magnetospheric interaction simulations. We further contrast these estimates against self‐consistent charging simulations using the Spacecraft Plasma Interaction Software (SPIS). Our results indicate that surface potentials should be mostly negative, ranging down to about −100 V. All model predictions exhibit a consistent morphological trend: closed field line regions are more negatively charged than open field line ones. Depending on the input used, the driver behind this trend can either be the spatial variations of plasma density alone or combined density and electron temperature patterns, especially in the ionosphere; the electron current is the dominant driver of surface potential, with the relative influence of secondary electron, ion, and photoelectron currents varying depending on the location at Ganymede. While estimates of absolute surface potential are consistent with aspects of Juno flyby data, they are heavily dependent on how simulated plasma parameters are extrapolated to Ganymede's surface. Consequently, advanced modeling is required to achieve more reliable constraints of Ganymede's near‐surface environment description.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(4)
California Institute of Technology (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Sorbonne Université (FR), Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (DE), Laboratoire atmosphères, milieux, observations spatiales (FR), National Institute for Astrophysics (IT), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
European Space Agency, Science Foundation Ireland, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Research Ireland
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.