A Green Infrastructure Prioritization Index Combining Woody Vegetation Deficits and Social Vulnerability in Temuco, Chile

This study developed and tested a neighborhood-scale framework that integrates unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral mapping and georeferenced socioeconomic data to identify inequities in urban green infrastructure and translate them into an operational prioritization tool for inclusive planning. Using object-based image analysis, impervious surfaces, low vegetation, and woody vegetation (trees and shrubs) were mapped across 33 Neighborhood Units in Temuco, Chile, and landscape metrics describing dominance, edge, isolation/connectivity, and diversity were derived. Socioeconomic conditions were summarized through Principal Component Analysis, and their relationships with vegetation metrics were evaluated using Generalized Additive Models. The results revealed strongly nonlinear and metric-specific associations, with the most robust relationships observed for woody-structure metrics, particularly total woody edge and built-environment isolation, whereas landscape diversity showed weaker but still significant dependence on resource-access gradients. To support inclusive planning, a dimensionless Green Infrastructure Prioritization Index (GIPI) was computed by combining standardized green deficit and standardized social vulnerability with equal weights. GIPI values ranged from 0.318 to 0.740 (median = 0.528), identifying 11 high-priority units characterized by higher social vulnerability and less favorable woody structure, including lower largest-patch dominance and greater isolation. Sensitivity analyses varying the deficit weight from 0.30 to 0.70 showed that 10 of the 11 high-priority units remained in the same class in at least 80% of weighting scenarios, indicating a stable priority set. Further classification of high-priority units according to dominant deficit type supported a staged intervention strategy, in which woody canopy is first increased in deficit nodes and subsequently reinforced through corridor-oriented greening to improve structural connectivity. These findings demonstrate the value of coupling fine-scale vegetation mapping with socioeconomic gradients to support more equitable urban green infrastructure planning.