Advantages of Coblation Adenoidectomy over Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy.

Adenoid is a patch of lymphoid tissue that is situated high up in the throat and just behind the nose in the nasopharynx. Adenoid along with the tonsils is a part of the lymphatic system that clears away infection and keeps body fluids in balance. Whenever, adenoid become enlarged, seriously infected or causes certain complications, adenoidectomy becomes essential. It can be performed with many ways including coblation adenoidectomy, conventional curettage adenoidectomy and adenoidectomy with microdebrider. The aim of this study was to assess the advantages of coblation adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy. This comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of ENT, Bangladesh Medical College Hospital and Popular Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh from July 2018 to December 2019. A total of100 admitted patients for adenoidectomy were included as the study. All the participants were divided in two groups. In Conventional group, there were 50 participants selected for conventional curettage adenoidectomy. On the other hand, in coblation group, other 50 participants selected for coblation adenoidectomy. For comparison of both the method all necessary data along with demographic and clinical status were collected in a predesigned questioner. All data were processed and analyzed and disseminated by using MS Office and SPSS version 23 programs as per need. In this study, as the superiority of coblation adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy, we found significantly lower 'intra operative blood loss in ml (7.58±3.28 ml)', 'post-operative bleeding (0.0%)', presence of residual lymphoid tissue (8.0%)', 'days with analgesics (10.42±3.60 days), 'post operative adenoid grading (0.0±0.0)', 'rate of recurrence (20.0%)' and 'needed days for recovery (4.68±2.17 days)' among coblation group patients than that among conventional group patients. Coblation adenoidectomy ensures easier and specific treatment for the patient. The findings of this study conclude that, in considering the attractive features like lower intra operative and post-operative blood loss, presence of residual lymphoid tissue, days with analgesics, post operative adenoid grading, rate of recurrence and needed days for recovery, coblation adenoidectomy may be considered as the method of choice for adenoid surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-01
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advantages of Coblation Adenoidectomy over Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy.

M A Islam, M. Mahbubur Rahman, A. B. M. Ashikur Rahman, S. S. Islam et al.
PubMed
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Advantages of Coblation Adenoidectomy over Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy.

M A Islam, M. Mahbubur Rahman, A. B. M. Ashikur Rahman, S. S. Islam, F U Milki, N H Choudhury
article en

Abstract

Adenoid is a patch of lymphoid tissue that is situated high up in the throat and just behind the nose in the nasopharynx. Adenoid along with the tonsils is a part of the lymphatic system that clears away infection and keeps body fluids in balance. Whenever, adenoid become enlarged, seriously infected or causes certain complications, adenoidectomy becomes essential. It can be performed with many ways including coblation adenoidectomy, conventional curettage adenoidectomy and adenoidectomy with microdebrider. The aim of this study was to assess the advantages of coblation adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy. This comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of ENT, Bangladesh Medical College Hospital and Popular Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh from July 2018 to December 2019. A total of100 admitted patients for adenoidectomy were included as the study. All the participants were divided in two groups. In Conventional group, there were 50 participants selected for conventional curettage adenoidectomy. On the other hand, in coblation group, other 50 participants selected for coblation adenoidectomy. For comparison of both the method all necessary data along with demographic and clinical status were collected in a predesigned questioner. All data were processed and analyzed and disseminated by using MS Office and SPSS version 23 programs as per need. In this study, as the superiority of coblation adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy, we found significantly lower 'intra operative blood loss in ml (7.58±3.28 ml)', 'post-operative bleeding (0.0%)', presence of residual lymphoid tissue (8.0%)', 'days with analgesics (10.42±3.60 days), 'post operative adenoid grading (0.0±0.0)', 'rate of recurrence (20.0%)' and 'needed days for recovery (4.68±2.17 days)' among coblation group patients than that among conventional group patients. Coblation adenoidectomy ensures easier and specific treatment for the patient. The findings of this study conclude that, in considering the attractive features like lower intra operative and post-operative blood loss, presence of residual lymphoid tissue, days with analgesics, post operative adenoid grading, rate of recurrence and needed days for recovery, coblation adenoidectomy may be considered as the method of choice for adenoid surgery.

PubMedVol. 35(2)
Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.