Participatory Scenario Design to Support Ex-ante Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Assessments in Four European Agricultural Case Studies

Anticipating future socioeconomic conditions through scenarios supports effective land-use planning and management that safeguards biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES). This study introduces a novel participatory scenario development protocol to design consistent, nested regional scenarios tailored for BES assessments of agricultural land-use. The protocol is applied in four European case studies (subnational regions in Austria, Estonia, Germany, and Switzerland), combining regional narratives with quantitative developments aligned with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for European agri-food systems for 2050 (Eur-Agri-SSPs). Two innovative scenario components are introduced: (i) land-use and management practices and (ii) land-use-biodiversity actions, including private and public instruments. These components are typically neglected in larger-scale scenario applications. Despite shared European boundary conditions from the Eur-Agri-SSPs, the regional scenarios exhibit substantial variation, driven by current land-use structures and stakeholder input. Scenario elements, shaped by existing funding schemes and socioeconomic contexts, vary substantially across scenarios and regions. Examples include the share of organic farms and the level of payments for agri-environment-climate measures. In Münsterland (Germany) and Lääne County (Estonia), current agri-environment payments are significantly lower than in Schwarzbubenland (Switzerland) or the Wienerwald (Austria), and this is reflected in the SSP1 ("..sustainable paths") and SSP2 ("..established paths") scenarios. This study demonstrates the value of regional extensions of the SSP framework, grounded in participatory processes, to support context-specific BES assessments. It contributes to scenario research by presenting key challenges and recommendations for nested participatory scenario design and by bridging the gap between global and continental frameworks and subnational implementation needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Management
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02435-y
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory Scenario Design to Support Ex-ante Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Assessments in Four European Agricultural Case Studies

Noëlle Klein, Peter Zander, Florian Danzinger, Monika Suškevičs et al.
Environmental Management
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Participatory Scenario Design to Support Ex-ante Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Assessments in Four European Agricultural Case Studies

Noëlle Klein, Peter Zander, Florian Danzinger, Monika Suškevičs, Tobias Conradt, Martin Schönhart, Sonja Kay, Janar Raet, Maaria Semm, Claudia Bethwell, Katrin Karner, Takamasa Nishizawa, Michael Glemnitz, Johannes Schuler, Thomas Wrbka, Laura Hämäläinen, Miguel Villoslada, Kalev Sepp, Rando Värnik
article en

Abstract

Anticipating future socioeconomic conditions through scenarios supports effective land-use planning and management that safeguards biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES). This study introduces a novel participatory scenario development protocol to design consistent, nested regional scenarios tailored for BES assessments of agricultural land-use. The protocol is applied in four European case studies (subnational regions in Austria, Estonia, Germany, and Switzerland), combining regional narratives with quantitative developments aligned with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for European agri-food systems for 2050 (Eur-Agri-SSPs). Two innovative scenario components are introduced: (i) land-use and management practices and (ii) land-use-biodiversity actions, including private and public instruments. These components are typically neglected in larger-scale scenario applications. Despite shared European boundary conditions from the Eur-Agri-SSPs, the regional scenarios exhibit substantial variation, driven by current land-use structures and stakeholder input. Scenario elements, shaped by existing funding schemes and socioeconomic contexts, vary substantially across scenarios and regions. Examples include the share of organic farms and the level of payments for agri-environment-climate measures. In Münsterland (Germany) and Lääne County (Estonia), current agri-environment payments are significantly lower than in Schwarzbubenland (Switzerland) or the Wienerwald (Austria), and this is reflected in the SSP1 ("..sustainable paths") and SSP2 ("..established paths") scenarios. This study demonstrates the value of regional extensions of the SSP framework, grounded in participatory processes, to support context-specific BES assessments. It contributes to scenario research by presenting key challenges and recommendations for nested participatory scenario design and by bridging the gap between global and continental frameworks and subnational implementation needs.

Environmental ManagementVol. 76(4)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), ETH Zurich (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Agroscope (CH), Federal Office for Agriculture (CH), Federal Institute of Agricultural Economics (AT), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), BOKU University (AT)
National Science Foundation, Biodiversa+, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eesti Teadusagentuur, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Austrian Science Fund, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.