Objective Methods for Regional Indices: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Brazilian Rural Development in 2017

To prepare development indices, in general, a significant part of the academic literature used traditional weighting, that is, according to the participation of the weight of the most important variances of the latent factors obtained through factor analysis. Based on this finding, the objective of the article is to contribute by presenting a discussion on three distinct objective weighting approaches originating from multicriteria analysis: Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC), Gini coefficient, and Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC). To evaluate the methods, the Rural Development Index was used. It was constructed using data from the Brazilian Agricultural Census, originating from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), and representative of the 5,570 Brazilian municipalities. The three methods will be used in the latent factors and compared with traditional weighting to represent the different classifications of rural development in the regions. In summary, the article's main contribution derives from the different regional categorizations presented by the new forms of weighting, which can help researchers in the difficult task of highlighting characteristics present in the latent factors produced that are more appropriate for representing phenomena related to rural and human regional development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Indicators Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-026-03829-5
Primary Topic
Rural Development and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective Methods for Regional Indices: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Brazilian Rural Development in 2017

Matheus Vanzela, Adriano Bernardo Renzi, José Luiz Parré
Social Indicators Research
Rural Development and Agriculture
article

Objective Methods for Regional Indices: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Brazilian Rural Development in 2017

Matheus Vanzela, Adriano Bernardo Renzi, José Luiz Parré
article en

Abstract

To prepare development indices, in general, a significant part of the academic literature used traditional weighting, that is, according to the participation of the weight of the most important variances of the latent factors obtained through factor analysis. Based on this finding, the objective of the article is to contribute by presenting a discussion on three distinct objective weighting approaches originating from multicriteria analysis: Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC), Gini coefficient, and Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC). To evaluate the methods, the Rural Development Index was used. It was constructed using data from the Brazilian Agricultural Census, originating from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), and representative of the 5,570 Brazilian municipalities. The three methods will be used in the latent factors and compared with traditional weighting to represent the different classifications of rural development in the regions. In summary, the article's main contribution derives from the different regional categorizations presented by the new forms of weighting, which can help researchers in the difficult task of highlighting characteristics present in the latent factors produced that are more appropriate for representing phenomena related to rural and human regional development.

Social Indicators ResearchVol. 182(3)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (BR)
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Division of Graduate Education
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Rural Development and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.