Real-world multi-institution analysis of tarlatamab in patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Tarlatamab has revolutionized the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is now a standard of care second-line therapy. Adoption of tarlatamab after FDA approval in the US has been rapid. However, real-world outcomes for patients who would not have met eligibility criteria for the clinical trials evaluating tarlatamab is not well-understood. METHODS: We designed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of three US institutions evaluating patients with SCLC who had received at least one dose of tarlatamab between 5/16/2024 and 6/15/2025. "Trial-ineligible" population was defined as patients with ECOG performance status ≥ 2, history of grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease, untreated brain metastases, organ dysfunction, oxygen requirement or pleural effusion, history of stroke in past 12 months, or ejection fraction < 50%. Primary study outcomes were measures of efficacy including best overall response per investigator and median time on treatment and measures of toxicity including incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity (ICANS). RESULTS: 102 patients were identified. Median age was 64; patients were mostly white (92%) with a current or former tobacco use history (94%). 60 patients (59%) would have been ineligible for trial. Of patients evaluable for response (n = 80), eligible patients (n = 34) were more likely to have partial response or stable disease (70%), whereas ineligible patients were more likely to have progressive disease (57%), p = 0.047. Eligible patients had longer median time on treatment (4.8 months (95% CI 3.1-NR) vs 2.1 months (95% CI 1.6-5.6), p = 0.06. There was no difference in CRS incidence between groups (63% vs 59%, p = 0.8), but ICANS was more common in the ineligible group (33% vs 14%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Tarlatamab may be broadly applied for patients not eligible for trial enrollment, though with potential for lower efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lung Cancer
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.109390
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world multi-institution analysis of tarlatamab in patients with small cell lung cancer

Joyce Liang, Catherine B. Meador, Alissa J. Cooper, Jacob M. Sands et al.
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer Research Studies
article

Real-world multi-institution analysis of tarlatamab in patients with small cell lung cancer

Joyce Liang, Catherine B. Meador, Alissa J. Cooper, Jacob M. Sands, Andrea Arfè, Bobby Daly, Julia Rivera, J. Ross, Wiktoria Bogdanska, Phoebe Clark, Justin F. Gainor, Charles M. Rudin, Stephanie McDonald, Shin Saito
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tarlatamab has revolutionized the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is now a standard of care second-line therapy. Adoption of tarlatamab after FDA approval in the US has been rapid. However, real-world outcomes for patients who would not have met eligibility criteria for the clinical trials evaluating tarlatamab is not well-understood. METHODS: We designed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of three US institutions evaluating patients with SCLC who had received at least one dose of tarlatamab between 5/16/2024 and 6/15/2025. "Trial-ineligible" population was defined as patients with ECOG performance status ≥ 2, history of grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease, untreated brain metastases, organ dysfunction, oxygen requirement or pleural effusion, history of stroke in past 12 months, or ejection fraction < 50%. Primary study outcomes were measures of efficacy including best overall response per investigator and median time on treatment and measures of toxicity including incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity (ICANS). RESULTS: 102 patients were identified. Median age was 64; patients were mostly white (92%) with a current or former tobacco use history (94%). 60 patients (59%) would have been ineligible for trial. Of patients evaluable for response (n = 80), eligible patients (n = 34) were more likely to have partial response or stable disease (70%), whereas ineligible patients were more likely to have progressive disease (57%), p = 0.047. Eligible patients had longer median time on treatment (4.8 months (95% CI 3.1-NR) vs 2.1 months (95% CI 1.6-5.6), p = 0.06. There was no difference in CRS incidence between groups (63% vs 59%, p = 0.8), but ICANS was more common in the ineligible group (33% vs 14%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Tarlatamab may be broadly applied for patients not eligible for trial enrollment, though with potential for lower efficacy.

Lung CancerVol. 216
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Conquer Cancer Foundation, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Lung Cancer Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.