Workplace bullying research at a crossroads: a five-decade bibliometric analysis and future pathways

Purpose This study aims to systematically map the intellectual, social and thematic structure of workplace bullying research over the past five decades, providing a consolidated overview of its theoretical foundations, collaborative structures and key research domains. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted on 3,359 peer-reviewed journal articles and review papers indexed in Scopus from 1975 to 2024. The study integrates performance analysis with science-mapping techniques, including co-citation analysis, co-authorship network analysis and keyword co-occurrence analysis. Findings The results reveal sustained growth in workplace bullying scholarship, shaped by influential contributions on abusive supervision, workplace aggression and incivility. Co-citation analysis identifies four interconnected knowledge domains: conceptual foundations of workplace bullying and aggression; leadership-driven mistreatment and abusive supervision; bullying prevalence, antecedents and consequences and workplace incivility with methodological foundations. Co-authorship networks display a core-periphery structure dominated by the United States, United Kingdom, China and Europe, with increasing participation from Asia, Latin America and Africa, indicating expanding international collaboration. Keyword co-occurrence patterns highlight strong thematic linkages around leadership, employee well-being and organizational support, reflecting the field's integrative and multi-level orientation. Originality/value This study offers one of the most comprehensive bibliometric syntheses of workplace bullying research to date by jointly examining its intellectual, social and conceptual structures within a unified framework. By clarifying conceptual intersections and identifying underexplored areas, the study provides a theoretically informed roadmap for future research and supports the development of evidence-based interventions aimed at fostering psychologically safe and equitable workplaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Review
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-08-2025-0860
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workplace bullying research at a crossroads: a five-decade bibliometric analysis and future pathways

Rosy Dhall, Mikul Budhiraja
Personnel Review
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Workplace bullying research at a crossroads: a five-decade bibliometric analysis and future pathways

Rosy Dhall, Mikul Budhiraja
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to systematically map the intellectual, social and thematic structure of workplace bullying research over the past five decades, providing a consolidated overview of its theoretical foundations, collaborative structures and key research domains. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted on 3,359 peer-reviewed journal articles and review papers indexed in Scopus from 1975 to 2024. The study integrates performance analysis with science-mapping techniques, including co-citation analysis, co-authorship network analysis and keyword co-occurrence analysis. Findings The results reveal sustained growth in workplace bullying scholarship, shaped by influential contributions on abusive supervision, workplace aggression and incivility. Co-citation analysis identifies four interconnected knowledge domains: conceptual foundations of workplace bullying and aggression; leadership-driven mistreatment and abusive supervision; bullying prevalence, antecedents and consequences and workplace incivility with methodological foundations. Co-authorship networks display a core-periphery structure dominated by the United States, United Kingdom, China and Europe, with increasing participation from Asia, Latin America and Africa, indicating expanding international collaboration. Keyword co-occurrence patterns highlight strong thematic linkages around leadership, employee well-being and organizational support, reflecting the field's integrative and multi-level orientation. Originality/value This study offers one of the most comprehensive bibliometric syntheses of workplace bullying research to date by jointly examining its intellectual, social and conceptual structures within a unified framework. By clarifying conceptual intersections and identifying underexplored areas, the study provides a theoretically informed roadmap for future research and supports the development of evidence-based interventions aimed at fostering psychologically safe and equitable workplaces.

Personnel Review
T A Pai Management Institute (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.