How Do Faster and Slower Bench Press Eccentric Tempos Affect the Concentric Performance of Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes During High and Maximal Intensity Loads?

Background: As Para-Powerlifting (PP) athletes need the maximum bench press concentric strength performance during competitions, the velocity of the eccentric phase could be critical to the sport’s success. Methods: Through eccentric tempo modification, normative, faster, and slower bench press eccentric velocities were tested on 16 experienced PP athletes. Mean propulsive velocity (MPV), maximum velocity (Vmax), and power were measured during a single bench press set at different loads (90% and 100% of 1RM) and tempos. After the bench press set, Maximal isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), impulse, variability, and maximal average force (MAF) were obtained through an isometric bench press test. Results: Slower and faster tempos were not different in concentric performance than a normative tempo at the 90% 1RM load. A faster tempo generated higher MPV and Vmax than a normative one at the 100% 1RM load. A normative tempo produced higher MIF than a slower tempo, and higher impulse than a faster tempo after a 90% 1RM bench press set. Conclusions: PP athletes seem to have an optimized technique in submaximal loads; however, they may need faster eccentric velocities in the 100% 1RM load to improve their concentric performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiologia
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia6020025
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Faster and Slower Bench Press Eccentric Tempos Affect the Concentric Performance of Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes During High and Maximal Intensity Loads?

Víctor Machado Reis, Alfonso López Díaz-de-Durana, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Nuno Domingos Garrido et al.
Physiologia
Sports Performance and Training
article

How Do Faster and Slower Bench Press Eccentric Tempos Affect the Concentric Performance of Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes During High and Maximal Intensity Loads?

Víctor Machado Reis, Alfonso López Díaz-de-Durana, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Nuno Domingos Garrido, Renato Méndez-delCanto, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Felipe J. Aidar, Ciro José Brito
article en

Abstract

Background: As Para-Powerlifting (PP) athletes need the maximum bench press concentric strength performance during competitions, the velocity of the eccentric phase could be critical to the sport’s success. Methods: Through eccentric tempo modification, normative, faster, and slower bench press eccentric velocities were tested on 16 experienced PP athletes. Mean propulsive velocity (MPV), maximum velocity (Vmax), and power were measured during a single bench press set at different loads (90% and 100% of 1RM) and tempos. After the bench press set, Maximal isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), impulse, variability, and maximal average force (MAF) were obtained through an isometric bench press test. Results: Slower and faster tempos were not different in concentric performance than a normative tempo at the 90% 1RM load. A faster tempo generated higher MPV and Vmax than a normative one at the 100% 1RM load. A normative tempo produced higher MIF than a slower tempo, and higher impulse than a faster tempo after a 90% 1RM bench press set. Conclusions: PP athletes seem to have an optimized technique in submaximal loads; however, they may need faster eccentric velocities in the 100% 1RM load to improve their concentric performance.

PhysiologiaVol. 6(2)
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR), Metropolitan University of Educational Sciences (CL), University of West Attica (GR), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.