Limitations of Cluster-Trained MLIPs for Liquid Density and Diffusivity

Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) based on quantum-mechanical data are often used as a means to combine the performance of classical force-fields with the accuracy of electronic structure methods. In this work, MLIPs based on the MACE architecture were trained, starting from two publicly available data sets: one based on periodic structures, and the other based on molecular cluster data. Two rather challenging liquid properties are in focus, density and diffusivity, here for the battery-relevant ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate solvents and mixtures thereof. The focus of our study is the uncertainties in the generated MLIP models themselves (calculated for committees of models with different regression seeds and different training set sizes) and how these uncertainties reflect on the MD-simulated target properties. The second focus point is whether these uncertainties are small enough to allow the comparison and assessment of different density functional theory (DFT) functionals; here, only a small number of them are compared, but the workflow opens up for a more extensive assessment of many DFT functionals. We find that all our MACE-MLIPs, both cluster-trained ones and the periodic-structure-trained ones, produce stable 1 ns NPT trajectories, regardless of training set size and cluster composition, but the MACE-MLIPs trained on cluster data (labeled with the hybrid ωB97X-D3 functional) are found to be sensitive to both the random training seed and the data selection, resulting in large uncertainties on the simulated diffusivity and density values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c02043
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of Cluster-Trained MLIPs for Liquid Density and Diffusivity

Ioan-Bogdan Magdău, Samuel P. Niblett, Viktor Svahn, Gábor Csányi et al.
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Limitations of Cluster-Trained MLIPs for Liquid Density and Diffusivity

Ioan-Bogdan Magdău, Samuel P. Niblett, Viktor Svahn, Gábor Csányi, Jolla Kullgren, Kersti Hermansson
article en

Abstract

Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) based on quantum-mechanical data are often used as a means to combine the performance of classical force-fields with the accuracy of electronic structure methods. In this work, MLIPs based on the MACE architecture were trained, starting from two publicly available data sets: one based on periodic structures, and the other based on molecular cluster data. Two rather challenging liquid properties are in focus, density and diffusivity, here for the battery-relevant ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate solvents and mixtures thereof. The focus of our study is the uncertainties in the generated MLIP models themselves (calculated for committees of models with different regression seeds and different training set sizes) and how these uncertainties reflect on the MD-simulated target properties. The second focus point is whether these uncertainties are small enough to allow the comparison and assessment of different density functional theory (DFT) functionals; here, only a small number of them are compared, but the workflow opens up for a more extensive assessment of many DFT functionals. We find that all our MACE-MLIPs, both cluster-trained ones and the periodic-structure-trained ones, produce stable 1 ns NPT trajectories, regardless of training set size and cluster composition, but the MACE-MLIPs trained on cluster data (labeled with the hybrid ωB97X-D3 functional) are found to be sensitive to both the random training seed and the data selection, resulting in large uncertainties on the simulated diffusivity and density values.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 22(7)
Uppsala University (SE), University of Cambridge (GB), Dassault Systèmes (United Kingdom) (GB), Dassault Systèmes (France) (FR), Newcastle University (GB)
European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking, Faraday Institution, Vetenskapsrådet, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.