Spatial release from masking predicts listening difficulty in children

OBJECTIVE: Children with listening difficulty (LiD) often have normal audiograms but impaired speech-in-noise perception. Although LiD is frequently linked to cognitive factors, deficits in spatial hearing may also indicate central auditory dysfunction. This study aimed to dissociate cognitive from auditory contributions to spatial release from masking (SRM). DESIGN: All children received audiometric assessments and completed the Listening in Spatialised Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) Spatial Advantage and the sound-field Digits-in-Noise (sfDiN), with maskers either co-located with or ±90° from target stimuli. sfDiN imposes lower cognitive demands than LiSN-S. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-five children (17 LiD, 18 typically developing [TD]; 8-17 years). RESULTS: Both groups showed improved sfDiN SRTs with spatial separation, but the LiD group had significantly poorer ±90° SRTs, yielding significantly lower SRM. In contrast, LiSN-S Spatial Advantage did not differ between groups. sfDiN-SRM correlated significantly with LiSN-S Spatial Advantage. ROC analyses indicated that the ±90°-SRT showed the strongest discrimination (AUC = 0.71), followed by the sfDiN-SRM (AUC = 0.69), whereas the LiSN-S Spatial Advantage demonstrated weaker discrimination (AUC = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced SRM in LiD indicates a spatial hearing deficit that is evident under conditions of reduced cognitive demand. sfDiN provides a sensitive, practical tool for identifying auditory contributions to LiD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2026.2650492
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial release from masking predicts listening difficulty in children

Nathan Clevenger, Meghan Grojean, Lina Motlagh Zadeh, David R. Moore
International Journal of Audiology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Spatial release from masking predicts listening difficulty in children

Nathan Clevenger, Meghan Grojean, Lina Motlagh Zadeh, David R. Moore
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Children with listening difficulty (LiD) often have normal audiograms but impaired speech-in-noise perception. Although LiD is frequently linked to cognitive factors, deficits in spatial hearing may also indicate central auditory dysfunction. This study aimed to dissociate cognitive from auditory contributions to spatial release from masking (SRM). DESIGN: All children received audiometric assessments and completed the Listening in Spatialised Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) Spatial Advantage and the sound-field Digits-in-Noise (sfDiN), with maskers either co-located with or ±90° from target stimuli. sfDiN imposes lower cognitive demands than LiSN-S. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-five children (17 LiD, 18 typically developing [TD]; 8-17 years). RESULTS: Both groups showed improved sfDiN SRTs with spatial separation, but the LiD group had significantly poorer ±90° SRTs, yielding significantly lower SRM. In contrast, LiSN-S Spatial Advantage did not differ between groups. sfDiN-SRM correlated significantly with LiSN-S Spatial Advantage. ROC analyses indicated that the ±90°-SRT showed the strongest discrimination (AUC = 0.71), followed by the sfDiN-SRM (AUC = 0.69), whereas the LiSN-S Spatial Advantage demonstrated weaker discrimination (AUC = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced SRM in LiD indicates a spatial hearing deficit that is evident under conditions of reduced cognitive demand. sfDiN provides a sensitive, practical tool for identifying auditory contributions to LiD.

International Journal of Audiology
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Saint Louis University (ES), University of Manchester (GB), Ortho Clinical Diagnostics (United States) (US), Saint Louis University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.