Branch-and-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes

Branch-and-bound algorithms (B&B) and polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) are two seemingly distant areas of combinatorial optimization. We intend to (partially) bridge the gap between them while expanding the boundary of theoretical knowledge on the B&B framework. Branch-and-bound algorithms typically guarantee that an optimal solution is eventually found. However, we show that the standard implementation of branch-and-bound for certain knapsack and scheduling problems also exhibits PTAS-like behavior, yielding increasingly better solutions within polynomial time. Our findings are supported by computational experiments and comparisons with benchmark methods. Funding: This work was supported by Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [Grant 200021_212929/1 (“Computational methods for integrality gaps analysis”)].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics of Operations Research
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2025.1183
Primary Topic
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Branch-and-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes

Monaldo Mastrolilli, Eleonora Vercesi, Koppány István Encz
Mathematics of Operations Research
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
article

Branch-and-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes

Monaldo Mastrolilli, Eleonora Vercesi, Koppány István Encz
article en

Abstract

Branch-and-bound algorithms (B&B) and polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) are two seemingly distant areas of combinatorial optimization. We intend to (partially) bridge the gap between them while expanding the boundary of theoretical knowledge on the B&B framework. Branch-and-bound algorithms typically guarantee that an optimal solution is eventually found. However, we show that the standard implementation of branch-and-bound for certain knapsack and scheduling problems also exhibits PTAS-like behavior, yielding increasingly better solutions within polynomial time. Our findings are supported by computational experiments and comparisons with benchmark methods. Funding: This work was supported by Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [Grant 200021_212929/1 (“Computational methods for integrality gaps analysis”)].

Mathematics of Operations Research
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research (CH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.