Assessment of Metallic Reductants in the Processing of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: Emphasis on Aqueous and Non-aqueous Leaching Processes

Leaching is a critical step in the recycling of cathode materials, such as lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) oxide, from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Conventional processes typically use aqueous mineral acids with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as a reductant. Recently, there is a growing attention on the development of non-aqueous leaching, which works by replacing water-based lixiviants with non-aqueous/water-limited systems, such as acidic organic extractants dissolved in non-polar diluents like kerosene. Metallic reductants (e.g., Cu and Al) are attractive alternatives to H2O2, with potential for co-recovery of reductant metals and improved transport and handling. This study evaluates the effectiveness of metallic reductants (Cu, Al, Ni, Mn, Fe, and Zn) in the leaching of cathode materials (LCO and NCM) under both aqueous and non-aqueous leaching systems. In aqueous leaching (using H2SO4), all the tested metallic reductants demonstrated effectiveness in advancing the leaching of cathode materials, and their performance was influenced by three key factors: (i) redox reactions, (ii) hydrogen gas (H2) formation, and (iii) cementation processes. In contrast, non-aqueous leaching exhibited a more complex mechanism, with Cu identified as the only effective reductant. This result prompted the proposal of leaching equilibria specific to the non-aqueous system. The study further investigated the effects of several parameters, including the mass ratio of metal reductant to cathode material, the presence of graphite, and, in the case of non-aqueous leaching, the impact of water addition and the choice of organic extractants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-026-00691-6
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Metallic Reductants in the Processing of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: Emphasis on Aqueous and Non-aqueous Leaching Processes

Sookyung Kim, Kurniawan Kurniawan
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Assessment of Metallic Reductants in the Processing of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: Emphasis on Aqueous and Non-aqueous Leaching Processes

Sookyung Kim, Kurniawan Kurniawan
article en

Abstract

Leaching is a critical step in the recycling of cathode materials, such as lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) oxide, from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Conventional processes typically use aqueous mineral acids with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as a reductant. Recently, there is a growing attention on the development of non-aqueous leaching, which works by replacing water-based lixiviants with non-aqueous/water-limited systems, such as acidic organic extractants dissolved in non-polar diluents like kerosene. Metallic reductants (e.g., Cu and Al) are attractive alternatives to H2O2, with potential for co-recovery of reductant metals and improved transport and handling. This study evaluates the effectiveness of metallic reductants (Cu, Al, Ni, Mn, Fe, and Zn) in the leaching of cathode materials (LCO and NCM) under both aqueous and non-aqueous leaching systems. In aqueous leaching (using H2SO4), all the tested metallic reductants demonstrated effectiveness in advancing the leaching of cathode materials, and their performance was influenced by three key factors: (i) redox reactions, (ii) hydrogen gas (H2) formation, and (iii) cementation processes. In contrast, non-aqueous leaching exhibited a more complex mechanism, with Cu identified as the only effective reductant. This result prompted the proposal of leaching equilibria specific to the non-aqueous system. The study further investigated the effects of several parameters, including the mass ratio of metal reductant to cathode material, the presence of graphite, and, in the case of non-aqueous leaching, the impact of water addition and the choice of organic extractants.

Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Argonne National Laboratory (US), Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KR), Korea University of Science and Technology (KR)
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.