Reducing ammonia emissions from rice paddies: Modeling and field test of an alternative fertilizer

• In Korea agriculture is the main source of NH₃ emissions with health impacts • Lowland and upland fields emitted ∼62% and 38% of cropping NH₃, respectively • Urea fertilization caused 17–36% N loss as NH₃ in rice paddy systems • Ammonium sulfate fertilizer cuts NH₃ losses by more than two-thirds • Field evidence shows yield is preserved despite emission reduction Agriculture contributes >80% of global ammonia (NH₃) emissions, underscoring the challenge of mitigating NH₃ volatilization because of its association with a spectrum of deleterious environmental and public health ramifications. The source-specific mitigation strategies yet remain poorly constrained due to limited integration of emission inventories with field validation. In this study, we combined process-based CHANS modeling with field experimentation to quantify sectoral contributions to NH₃ emissions and evaluate fertilizer-based mitigation in Korean agriculture. Between 2001 and 2019, the agricultural sector contributed about 72-80% of total NH₃ emissions in Korea, with cropping systems contributing 12% (36% lowland and 64% upland) and livestock production representing the predominant source at 88%. Model analysis identified urea application in paddies was the predominant source of NH₃ emissions, prompting the hypothesis that substituting urea with ammonium sulfate could reduce NH₃ volatilization . A systematic field trial revealed rapid post-fertilization emissions, with NH₃ fluxes peaking immediately following fertilization and returning to background levels within 3–4 days regardless of the type of N fertilizer. In total, 15% and 49% of applied N were volatilized as NH₃ following urea applications at 45 and 90 kg N ha⁻¹, respectively. In contrast, emissions from ammonium sulfate were consistently < 22%. Importantly, rice yields were unaffected by fertilizer type. These findings indicate that replacing urea with ammonium sulfate can substantially mitigate NH₃ emissions without compromising productivity, offering a practical strategy for reducing agricultural ammonia losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Advances
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2026.100703
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing ammonia emissions from rice paddies: Modeling and field test of an alternative fertilizer

Snowie Jane C. Galgo, Ali Fakhar, Ronley C. Canatoy, Benjamin L. Turner et al.
Environmental Advances
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Reducing ammonia emissions from rice paddies: Modeling and field test of an alternative fertilizer

Snowie Jane C. Galgo, Ali Fakhar, Ronley C. Canatoy, Benjamin L. Turner, Pil Joo Kim, Young Ho Seo
article en

Abstract

• In Korea agriculture is the main source of NH₃ emissions with health impacts • Lowland and upland fields emitted ∼62% and 38% of cropping NH₃, respectively • Urea fertilization caused 17–36% N loss as NH₃ in rice paddy systems • Ammonium sulfate fertilizer cuts NH₃ losses by more than two-thirds • Field evidence shows yield is preserved despite emission reduction Agriculture contributes >80% of global ammonia (NH₃) emissions, underscoring the challenge of mitigating NH₃ volatilization because of its association with a spectrum of deleterious environmental and public health ramifications. The source-specific mitigation strategies yet remain poorly constrained due to limited integration of emission inventories with field validation. In this study, we combined process-based CHANS modeling with field experimentation to quantify sectoral contributions to NH₃ emissions and evaluate fertilizer-based mitigation in Korean agriculture. Between 2001 and 2019, the agricultural sector contributed about 72-80% of total NH₃ emissions in Korea, with cropping systems contributing 12% (36% lowland and 64% upland) and livestock production representing the predominant source at 88%. Model analysis identified urea application in paddies was the predominant source of NH₃ emissions, prompting the hypothesis that substituting urea with ammonium sulfate could reduce NH₃ volatilization . A systematic field trial revealed rapid post-fertilization emissions, with NH₃ fluxes peaking immediately following fertilization and returning to background levels within 3–4 days regardless of the type of N fertilizer. In total, 15% and 49% of applied N were volatilized as NH₃ following urea applications at 45 and 90 kg N ha⁻¹, respectively. In contrast, emissions from ammonium sulfate were consistently < 22%. Importantly, rice yields were unaffected by fertilizer type. These findings indicate that replacing urea with ammonium sulfate can substantially mitigate NH₃ emissions without compromising productivity, offering a practical strategy for reducing agricultural ammonia losses.

Environmental AdvancesVol. 24
Gyeongsang National University (KR), Central Mindanao University (PH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.