Effect of Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis on Postoperative Mortality in Patients With Kidney Failure
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Patients receiving chronic dialysis have increased risks of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Studies have suggested that patients receving hemodiafiltration (HDF) compared to hemodialysis (HD) may benefit from improved cardiovascular health, reduced infections and better overall survival. This study aimed to determine if patients receving HDF had improved postoperative outcomes after elective surgery compared to patients receiving HD. METHODS: Bi-national population cohort study evaluated all incident and prevalent patients receiving chronic hemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand. Surgeries included upper gastrointestinal, anorectal, hernia surgery, cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular and infective outcomes. As there was potential for data to be correlated with multiple surgeries clustered at the patient and centre level, a multi-level mixed effects logistic regression model was used, with patient level covariates as fixed effects and dialysis centre as random intercepts, whereby patients were nested within centres. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 1750 surgeries in 1669 patients, of which 416 (23.8%) were receiving HDF. The median age was similar in both groups, as was the prevalence of comorbidities. Patients receiving HDF had received dialysis for a shorter period (0.9 vs. 2.3 years, p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was lower in patients receiving HDF than in those receiving HD (1.9 vs. 3.3%, p < 0.005). Using multi-level mixed effects logistic regression, HDF was not associated with reduced mortality odds (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.37-1.93) compared to patients receiving HD. Patients on HDF experienced a lower rate of a composite of infections (5.5 vs. 9.8%, p = 0.012), and required less blood transfusions (7.7 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.009). The occurrence of cardiovascular complications was not significantly different between the two groups (1.4 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: The use of HDF was not associated with lower postoperative mortality odds but lower rates of infective complications compared to HD were observed.
Authors
- Dharmenaan Palamuthusingam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1505-3482)
- Martin Wolley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-5073)
- Magid Fahim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-7842)
- Neil C Boudville (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-640X)
- David Wayne Johnson
- Girish Talaulikar
- C Hawley
- E Pascoe
- Matthew D. Jose
- Nicholas B. Cross
- Stephen McDonald
Institutions
- Griffith University (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Translational Research Institute (AU)
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
- Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU)
- Christchurch Hospital (NZ)
- Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
- Metro South Health (AU)
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (AU)
- New Zealand Brain Research Institute (NZ)
- Kidney Health Australia (AU)
- Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust (NZ)
- Tasmanian Abalone Council (Australia) (AU)
- Act Health (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- University of Otago (NZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hemodialysis International
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.70072
- Primary Topic
- Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Royal Australasian College of Physicians