Multifunctionality of annual forage crop mixtures for improved biomass, beef cattle diets, and soil health outcomes

Abstract Cover crop mixtures (CCMs) can fit well into various agricultural production systems and have gained popularity among grain and livestock producers, as well as organic and market gardeners across western Canada, due to their potential to enhance forage production and soil health. This study evaluated nine CCM treatments, comprising seven multispecies combinations (two‐ to eight‐way), monocultures of barley and oats, and three seeding rates (100%, 125%, and 150%). The results showed significant effects of CCM ( p < 0.001), seeding rate ( p < 0.001), and their interaction ( p < 0.001) on forage yield and normalized difference vegetation index. The highest forage yield (10,084 kg ha − 1 ) was observed in a six‐species mixture at 125% seeding rate. Nutritive value, such as crude protein (CP), total digestible nutrients (TDN), and fiber components, varied significantly across the mixtures. The eight‐species mixture had the highest CP and acid detergent fiber (ADF), while the five‐species mixture had the highest TDN. Principal component analysis revealed clear clustering of forage mixtures based on both nutritive and soil parameters, with key indicators including ADF, net energy for lactation, neutral detergent fiber, phosphorus, and soil organic matter. Notably, forage yield was not significantly correlated with any of the nutritive parameters. However, CP and relative feed quality were positively correlated with several quality indicators. These findings highlight the potential of optimized CCMs and seeding rates to enhance forage yield and quality while supporting soil health across diverse agroecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70325
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multifunctionality of annual forage crop mixtures for improved biomass, beef cattle diets, and soil health outcomes

Surendra Bhattarai, Guillermo Hernandez‐Ramirez, Yamily J. Zavala, Hayford Gyamfi et al.
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Multifunctionality of annual forage crop mixtures for improved biomass, beef cattle diets, and soil health outcomes

Surendra Bhattarai, Guillermo Hernandez‐Ramirez, Yamily J. Zavala, Hayford Gyamfi, Bharat Shrestha, Akim Tunde Omokanye, Blasius Azuhnwi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cover crop mixtures (CCMs) can fit well into various agricultural production systems and have gained popularity among grain and livestock producers, as well as organic and market gardeners across western Canada, due to their potential to enhance forage production and soil health. This study evaluated nine CCM treatments, comprising seven multispecies combinations (two‐ to eight‐way), monocultures of barley and oats, and three seeding rates (100%, 125%, and 150%). The results showed significant effects of CCM ( p < 0.001), seeding rate ( p < 0.001), and their interaction ( p < 0.001) on forage yield and normalized difference vegetation index. The highest forage yield (10,084 kg ha − 1 ) was observed in a six‐species mixture at 125% seeding rate. Nutritive value, such as crude protein (CP), total digestible nutrients (TDN), and fiber components, varied significantly across the mixtures. The eight‐species mixture had the highest CP and acid detergent fiber (ADF), while the five‐species mixture had the highest TDN. Principal component analysis revealed clear clustering of forage mixtures based on both nutritive and soil parameters, with key indicators including ADF, net energy for lactation, neutral detergent fiber, phosphorus, and soil organic matter. Notably, forage yield was not significantly correlated with any of the nutritive parameters. However, CP and relative feed quality were positively correlated with several quality indicators. These findings highlight the potential of optimized CCMs and seeding rates to enhance forage yield and quality while supporting soil health across diverse agroecosystems.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 9(2)
University of Wyoming (US), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University for Peace (NL), Cook Research (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.