Cheerful Discontent: Understanding the African Well-being Paradox
While positive affect and life evaluation are positively correlated in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), their relationship is much weaker than in Western countries, suggesting a misalignment between how people feel and how they judge their lives, a pattern we refer to as the African well-being paradox. Using Gallup World Poll microdata (2013–2024) covering 39 SSA and 27 Western countries, we construct an individual-level measure of this misalignment: the difference between positive affect and life evaluation scores (the PA-LE balance) and analyse its determinants using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Our results show that the PA-LE balance in SSA is both higher and more widely dispersed than in Western countries. More than two-thirds of individuals in SSA exhibit a positive balance and can be classified as “cheerfully discontented”. In contrast, Western countries exhibit a narrower, more symmetric distribution. Across regions, optimism and negative affect account for the largest share of predictive attribution. The distinct SSA pattern arises not from different drivers, but from their configuration: comparatively low economic optimism coexists with relatively low negative affect. This suggests that structural constraints shape life evaluations, while relational and social resources sustain positive daily experiences, creating a situation of “cheerful discontent”.
Authors
- Talita Greyling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3777-7003)
- Stephanié Rossouw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3538-9215)
- Martijn J. Burger
Institutions
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Social Indicators Research
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-026-03842-8
- Primary Topic
- African cultural and philosophical studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand