Interacting Cross-Space: Challenges and Insights on Conversational Power in Hybrid Meetings

While the prevalence of hybrid meetings brought tremendous economic and social benefits, it is important to identify and address the unique challenges of cross-space interactions between in-person and remote attendees. We conducted 30 observations and 25 in-depth interviews to investigate cross-space interactions. We found that in-person and remote attendees were able to transcend the segmented space and spontaneously interact, especially when the technology was set up properly; however, remote participants sometimes had to fight for the conversational floor. We found that interactions were sometimes affected by where the conversational power resided. The medium that has more attendees holds the power of speaking and influences behaviors of attendees joining from the other medium. We contribute to the literature by providing new insights that are specific to the context when hybrid meetings are more large scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3799446
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interacting Cross-Space: Challenges and Insights on Conversational Power in Hybrid Meetings

Xiaoyan Li, Jiajing Guo, Susan R. Fussell
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Interacting Cross-Space: Challenges and Insights on Conversational Power in Hybrid Meetings

Xiaoyan Li, Jiajing Guo, Susan R. Fussell
article en

Abstract

While the prevalence of hybrid meetings brought tremendous economic and social benefits, it is important to identify and address the unique challenges of cross-space interactions between in-person and remote attendees. We conducted 30 observations and 25 in-depth interviews to investigate cross-space interactions. We found that in-person and remote attendees were able to transcend the segmented space and spontaneously interact, especially when the technology was set up properly; however, remote participants sometimes had to fight for the conversational floor. We found that interactions were sometimes affected by where the conversational power resided. The medium that has more attendees holds the power of speaking and influences behaviors of attendees joining from the other medium. We contribute to the literature by providing new insights that are specific to the context when hybrid meetings are more large scale.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 10(1)
Cornell University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.