Investigation of Content Validity and Exploratory Factor Analysis of Students’ Pedagogical Knowledge of Science

This study aims to enhance the pedagogical knowledge of science among pre-service teachers in Elementary School Teacher Education (ESTE) and identify the factors influencing their understanding of scientific concepts. We employed Cohen’s Kappa coefficient to assess inter-rater reliability for the evaluation tools, alongside exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to uncover latent constructs related to Pedagogical Knowledge of Science (PKS) with a sample size of 989 pre-service science teachers in Elementary School Teacher Education (ESTE). questionnaire is designed to measure various dimensions of their pedagogical content knowledge. The findings indicate that Cohen’s Kappa coefficient demonstrated strong reliability at 0.8 across multiple items in the assessment tool, suggesting consistent agreement between raters. Furthermore, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed an excellent model fit. PKS has 3 domains, namely Pedagogy of Science Curriculum (PoSC), Pedagogy of Science Instructional Strategies (PoSIS), and Pedagogy of Learner and Learning (PoLL). These results underscore the importance of reliable assessment tools in evaluating teacher competencies in science education. The identified factors can inform curriculum development for teacher preparation programs by emphasizing areas where future educators may require additional support or training, ultimately enhancing educational outcomes in science classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042606
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Content Validity and Exploratory Factor Analysis of Students’ Pedagogical Knowledge of Science

Purwo Susongko, Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo, Wulan Aulia Azizah
Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Investigation of Content Validity and Exploratory Factor Analysis of Students’ Pedagogical Knowledge of Science

Purwo Susongko, Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo, Wulan Aulia Azizah
article en

Abstract

This study aims to enhance the pedagogical knowledge of science among pre-service teachers in Elementary School Teacher Education (ESTE) and identify the factors influencing their understanding of scientific concepts. We employed Cohen’s Kappa coefficient to assess inter-rater reliability for the evaluation tools, alongside exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to uncover latent constructs related to Pedagogical Knowledge of Science (PKS) with a sample size of 989 pre-service science teachers in Elementary School Teacher Education (ESTE). questionnaire is designed to measure various dimensions of their pedagogical content knowledge. The findings indicate that Cohen’s Kappa coefficient demonstrated strong reliability at 0.8 across multiple items in the assessment tool, suggesting consistent agreement between raters. Furthermore, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed an excellent model fit. PKS has 3 domains, namely Pedagogy of Science Curriculum (PoSC), Pedagogy of Science Instructional Strategies (PoSIS), and Pedagogy of Learner and Learning (PoLL). These results underscore the importance of reliable assessment tools in evaluating teacher competencies in science education. The identified factors can inform curriculum development for teacher preparation programs by emphasizing areas where future educators may require additional support or training, ultimately enhancing educational outcomes in science classrooms.

Journal Human Research in RehabilitationVol. 16(1)
Yogyakarta State University (ID), State University of Semarang (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.